US · rules
E.D. Okla. LCvR 26.2
Privilege Log
(a) In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b), when a claim of privilege or work product
protection is asserted in response to a discovery request for documents, the party
asserting the privilege or protection shall provide the following information with respect
to each document in the form of a privilege log: the type of document; the general
subject matter of the document; the date of the document; the author of the document,
whether or not the author is a lawyer; each recipient of the document; and the privilege
asserted. This rule shall apply only to document requests.
(b) If information called for by one or more of the foregoing categories is itself privileged, it
need not be disclosed. However, the existence of the document and any non-privileged
information called for by the other categories must be disclosed. This rule requires
preparation of a privilege log with respect to all documents withheld on the basis of a
claim of privilege or work product protection except the following: written
communications between a party and its trial counsel after commencement of the action
and the work product material created after commencement of the action.
Provenance
- Source
- www.oked.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
7db3532201583d12aa3c737bd317a7f8ad630a543870530e082b672b05c77d88
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.