Bindinglaw

US · rules

E.D. Okla. LCrR 32.2

Sentencing Correspondence

activein force · 2016-07-05 – presentact-effective-date

Attorneys for all parties shall arrange to have written correspondence on behalf of

defendants, victims, or other interested parties, which is submitted for the Court's

consideration at sentencing, sent to the Court through the probation office. Upon receipt of

such materials, the probation office shall ensure through counsel that all parties have copies of

such correspondence prior to sentencing. Any written correspondence sent directly to the

Court pertinent to a defendant pending sentencing should also be made available to counsel of

record prior to sentencing. Any correspondence received by the Court or the probation office

shall be treated in the same manner as the presentence report, and shall not be released to

third parties without approval of the Court. Further, any such correspondence shall not be

filed of record. An inadvertent failure to supply such correspondence to counsel shall not be

a basis for resentencing except to correct a manifest injustice.

Further, in exceptional situations, the Court may determine that certain correspondence

involves security or privacy concerns which require the correspondence to be placed under seal

and not be furnished to the parties, subject to the provisions of Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure 32.

Provenance

Source
www.oked.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
a50b68cea50171f0e5fffe79bd9426f482bd4fabb8339a018b710f2c55ea7d3c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.