US · rules
E.D. Okla. LCrR 32.2
Sentencing Correspondence
Attorneys for all parties shall arrange to have written correspondence on behalf of
defendants, victims, or other interested parties, which is submitted for the Court's
consideration at sentencing, sent to the Court through the probation office. Upon receipt of
such materials, the probation office shall ensure through counsel that all parties have copies of
such correspondence prior to sentencing. Any written correspondence sent directly to the
Court pertinent to a defendant pending sentencing should also be made available to counsel of
record prior to sentencing. Any correspondence received by the Court or the probation office
shall be treated in the same manner as the presentence report, and shall not be released to
third parties without approval of the Court. Further, any such correspondence shall not be
filed of record. An inadvertent failure to supply such correspondence to counsel shall not be
a basis for resentencing except to correct a manifest injustice.
Further, in exceptional situations, the Court may determine that certain correspondence
involves security or privacy concerns which require the correspondence to be placed under seal
and not be furnished to the parties, subject to the provisions of Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure 32.
Provenance
- Source
- www.oked.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
a50b68cea50171f0e5fffe79bd9426f482bd4fabb8339a018b710f2c55ea7d3c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.