Bindinglaw

US · rules

S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 26.1

Form of Discovery Documents

activein force · 2024-10-21 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Parties responding or objecting to discovery requests shall quote each such

interrogatory or request in full immediately preceding the statement of any answer,

response, or objection thereto. A privilege log shall list documents, electronically

stored information, communications, or tangible things withheld in an organized and

logical order and must contain sufficient information to enable an opposing party and

the Court to evaluate the applicability of the claimed privilege or protection.

(b) The parties shall number each interrogatory, request, answer, response, or objection

sequentially, regardless of the number of sets of interrogatories or requests, throughout

the entire course of the action.

Provenance

Source
www.ohsd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
37700b30f8f16e2660971fa6ecbbed8ea5b2640463decfa56010d8420bde73aa
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.