US · rules
N.D. Ohio LR 32.1
Videotape Depositions
(a) General. The use at trial of videotape depositions in civil cases is
encouraged. Insofar as possible, the technology of videotape equipment should be
utilized to enable the jury to obtain the same factual presentation as would be obtainable
if the witness were to appear live in the courtroom. Counsel may, if desired, use multiple
cameras and be videotaped while interrogating the deponent or appear with the deponent
during all or part of the interrogation.
(b) Guidelines.
(1) Objective. The objective of each videotape deposition shall be to
provide a visual and audio record that will, as nearly as possible, approximate the
live appearance of the deponent before the trier of fact.
(2) Deposition Officer. The officer presiding at a videotape deposition
shall be independent of any of the parties or the counsel of any of the parties. The
deposition officer shall be a person authorized under the law to administer an oath
to the witness. The deposition officer may also be either the stenographer
recording the proceeding or the camera person recording the proceeding by
videotape.
(3) The Camera Person or Persons. Counsel for the party noticing the
deposition shall be responsible for providing the camera person or persons to
record the deposition by videotape. If such camera person or persons is other than
the deposition officer, such person may be anyone selected by the counsel
noticing the deposition, including an employee of counsel. It will be the
obligation of the counsel seeking the deposition to determine that matters of
staging and technique such as the placement of the camera(s) and any
microphone(s), lighting, camera angles, and backgrounds, as well as the use of
any demonstrations or exhibits do fairly, accurately and objectively reproduce and
record the testimony. Any objections as to any of the proceedings in the taking of
the deposition shall be accurately recorded and timely interposed so that the
opposing counsel, insofar as possible, may take corrective action. The Court shall
ultimately rule on all objections and make such orders as the Court deems
appropriate for the editing of any videotape deposition to prevent prejudice to any
of the parties to the action.
(4) Use of Date/Time Generator. There shall be employed at the
deposition a date/time generator to create on the videotape a continuous record of
the date and time.
(5) Commencing the Deposition. The deposition officer shall commence
the deposition by stating on the videotape record his or her name and business
address; the name and business address of the officer's employer; the date, time,
and place; the name of the deponent and the caption of the action; the identity of
the party on whose behalf the deposition is being taken; and the names of all
persons present in the deposition room. The deposition officer shall also swear,
on the videotape record, that he or she will record the deposition accurately and
abide by all provisions of this Rule. The deponent shall be sworn on the
videotape record by a person authorized to administer oaths.
(6) Going "Off Camera". The deposition officer shall not stop the
videotape recorder after the deposition commences until it concludes, except,
however, that any party may request such cessation, which request will be
honored unless another party objects. Each time the tape is stopped or started, the
deposition officer shall announce the time on the record.
(7) Changing Tapes. If the deposition requires the use of more than one
tape, the end of each tape and the beginning of the next shall be announced orally
on the videotape record by the deposition officer. In addition, at the beginning of
each tape, the deposition officer shall repeat the officer's name and business
address, the date, time, and place of the deposition, and the name of the deponent.
At the end of the deposition, the deposition officer shall state on the record that
the deposition is complete.
(8) Availability of Monitor. There shall be available to counsel
throughout the deposition a monitor on which they can view the videotape record
as it is being made.
(9) Exhibitions and Demonstrations. A deponent shall be permitted to
conduct demonstrations or experiments or reenact physical events during the
course of a videotape deposition. Likewise, a party shall be entitled to utilize with
the deponent any visual aids or exhibits in such manner as though the witness
were appearing live in Court. Counsel may appear with the deponent in the
videotape. Any opposing counsel may interpose any objection which he or she
deems appropriate to the use of such demonstrations, experiments, or
reenactments or visual aids or exhibits, and the Court shall ultimately rule upon
such objections and determine whether or not the matter objected to is to be
shown to the jury or edited out of the videotape.
(10) Need to Object Timely. Wherever objections are permitted by this
Rule, such objections must be timely raised so as to give the opposing party an
opportunity to correct the condition which is the subject of the objection.
(11) Recording. The party taking the deposition shall state in the notice
the method by which the testimony shall be recorded. Unless the Court orders
otherwise, it may be recorded by sound, sound-and-visual, or stenographic means,
and the party taking the deposition shall bear the cost of the recording. Any party
may arrange for a transcription to be made from the recording of a deposition
taken by nonstenographic means.
(12) Discrepancies Between Videotape and Stenographic Records. In the
event of any material discrepancy between the videotape record and the
stenographic transcript, the Court shall determine which record shall be submitted
to the trier of fact.
(13) Examination and Correction of Deposition Record. If requested by
the deponent or a party before completion of the deposition, after the stenographic
transcript of the deposition is completed and available for inspection, the
deposition officer shall notify the deponent of such availability. The deponent
shall be given thirty (30) days from receipt of such notice to review the original
videotape and stenographic transcript of the deposition and to request in writing
(or on the videotape record if it is still open) any changes or corrections in such
records.
(14) Waiver of Execution. Forty-five (45) days after the notice of
availability described in subsection (b)(13) is received by all parties, the original
of the videotape and stenographic reporting (together with all requests for changes
or corrections theretofore received) shall be filed with the Clerk, where it shall
have the same force and effect as a duly executed original stenographic transcript
of the deponent's testimony. The Clerk shall release the original videotape for
viewing only upon order of the Court.
(15) Certification of the Videotape Record. No later than ten (10) days
before trial, the deposition officer and any other technician employed at the
deposition shall file with the Clerk their sworn statements that the videotape is an
accurate and complete record of the deposition and that they have complied with
all provisions of this Rule and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applicable to a
stenographic reporter or the deposition officer. The certification shall indicate
whether any review of the record was requested and, if so, shall append any
changes made by the deponent during the period allowed. Counsel for a party,
however, if in custody of the videotape record, may file the videotape record and
prepare the sworn statement and sign it as counsel. The sworn statement called
for by this section shall be served upon all of the parties.
(16) Custody of the Tape. The deposition officer shall maintain custody
of the original tape until it is filed with the Court. Parties may view the tape while
it is in the officer's custody, but only under conditions that make impossible the
erasure or alteration of the tape. The parties may agree that counsel for the party
noticing the deposition retain custody of the tape in which event it will be the
responsibility of such counsel to file the sworn statement called for under
subsection (b)(15) of this Rule.
(17) Editing the Tape. If any party desires to offer any portion of the
videotape record at trial, such party shall, no later than five (5) days before trial,
advise all other parties of the portions of the tape it wishes to offer. Any party
who believes that the portion so designated contains objectionable material may,
by motion, seek the Court's ruling on its admissibility in advance of trial. An
edited tape, eliminating material found by the Court to be objectionable, shall be
prepared at the expense of the party responsible for the original inclusion of that
material, unless the parties provide, or the Court orders, another method for the
suppression of the objectionable material or allocation of cost. Nothing in this
paragraph is intended to supersede the Local Rules concerning premarking of
exhibits for trial.
(18) Rulings on Admissibility. The Court, prior to voir dire, shall make
rulings as they relate to any videotape deposition filed in accordance with
subsection (b)(17) of this Rule, which rulings will include any orders that may
require editing of the videotape prior to its being shown to the jury. It will be the
responsibility of counsel proffering the videotape deposition to ascertain that the
final form of the videotape deposition as shall be shown to the jury conforms to
all such rulings. The purpose of such rulings prior to voir dire is to advise the
parties prior to voir dire and opening statements so that the parties will know what
evidence will be forthcoming from the videotape deposition.
History
Last revised 4/7/97. See Historical Notes for full revision history.
Provenance
- Source
- www.ohnd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
649a41a564a7ef4f5a13a93eaf21bd64efd2222e2ee431ef3ddaf4d9b620af1c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.