Bindinglaw

US · rules

N.D. Ohio LR 3.1

Assignment of Cases; Related Cases, Refiled, Dismissed and Remanded Cases

activein force · 2019-10-10 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Assignment. Subject to the latter provisions of this Rule, upon filing, each

civil case shall be assigned by random draw to a District Judge. He or she shall continue

in the case or matter until its final disposition. Any case received from the random draw

may be transferred, with the concurrence of the receiving District Judge and the approval

of the Chief Judge.

A motion to file a new civil case or complaint under seal shall be randomly assigned to a

District Judge who will continue to preside over the case.

With regard to all civil proceedings in the Eastern Division of the Court, after each case

is assigned by random draw to a District Judge, the Clerk shall immediately assign a

Magistrate Judge to the case in accordance with orders of the Court.

(b) Reassignment. Cases shall be assigned other than by random draw only in

the instances set forth in this paragraph. Such assignments shall be made by the Clerk in

accordance with these Rules. When an additional assignment is thus made to a District

Judge under any of the following sub-paragraphs, an electronic card for said District

Judge shall be removed from the deck from the same category from which the case would

have been drawn.

(1) Disqualification. Should a District Judge be disqualified from hearing

a case assigned to him or her, the case shall be reassigned by random draw in the

respective division. If the case had been on the docket of the disqualified judge

more than three months, the newly assigned district judge may, within one month,

transfer a case of the same general age and complexity to the disqualified judge in

lieu of having an electronic case assignment card removed from the deck.

(2) Subsequent Proceedings. Subsequent proceedings in civil cases shall

be assigned to the District Judge who heard the original case.

(3) Related Cases. A case may be re-assigned as related to an earlier

assigned case with the concurrence of both the transferee and the transferor

Judicial Officers, with or without a motion/notice by counsel. There is a

presumption of the Court not to re-assign a case when the earlier case is closed.

(4) Refiled, Dismissed and Remanded Cases. If an action is filed or

removed to this Court and assigned to a District Judge after which it is

discontinued, dismissed or remanded to a State Court, and subsequently refiled, it

shall be assigned to the same District Judge who received the initial case

assignment without regard for the place of holding court in which the case was

refiled. Counsel or a party without counsel shall be responsible for bringing such

case to the attention of the Court by responding to the questions included on the

Civil Cover Sheet.

When it becomes apparent to the District Judge to whom a case is

assigned that the case was previously filed in this Court and assigned to another

District Judge and was discontinued, dismissed without prejudice or remanded to

a State Court, the two District Judges shall sign an order reassigning the case to

the District Judge who had been assigned the earlier case.

(5) Transfer of Civil Actions. Any case received from the random draw

may be transferred, with the concurrence of the receiving District Judge and the

approval of the Chief Judge.

History

(See LCrR 57.9) Last revised 10/10/19. See Historical Notes for full revision history.

Provenance

Source
www.ohnd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
975a80a6ca89e3567f63bb20a0ac3255fb40b223e13be75c51886babecfb3fe0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.D. Ohio LR 3.1 — Assignment of Cases; Related Cases… · binding.law