Bindinglaw

US · rules

N.D. Ohio LCrR 49.1.1

General Rules of Pleading

activein force · 2024-10-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) In compliance with the policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States, and

the E-Government Act of 2002, and in order to promote electronic access to case files

while also protecting personal privacy and other legitimate interests, parties shall refrain

from including, or shall partially redact where inclusion is necessary, the following

personal data identifiers from all documents filed with the Court, including exhibits

thereto, whether filed electronically or on paper, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

(1) Social Security numbers. If an individual’s Social Security number must

be included in a document, only the last four digits of that number should be used.

(2) Names of minor children. If the involvement of a minor child must be

mentioned, only the initials of that child should be used.

(3) Dates of birth. If an individual’s date of birth must be included in a

document, only the year should be used.

(4) Financial account numbers. If financial account numbers are relevant,

only the last four digits of these numbers should be used.

(5) Home addresses. If a home address must be included, only the city and

state should be listed.

(b) In compliance with the E-Government Act of 2002, a party wishing to file a

document containing the personal data identifiers listed above may

(1) file a redacted document in the public record and file a reference list under

seal. The reference list shall contain the complete personal data identifier(s) and

the redacted identifier(s) used in its(their) place in the filing. All references in the

case to the redacted identifiers included in the reference list will be construed to

refer to the corresponding complete personal data identifier. The reference list

must be filed under seal, and may be amended as of right, or

(2) file an unredacted version of the document under seal.

(c) The unredacted version of the document or the reference list shall be retained by

the Court as part of the record. The Court may, however, still require the party to file a

redacted copy for the public file.

The responsibility for redacting these personal identifiers rests solely with counsel and the

parties. The Clerk will not review each document for compliance with this rule.

(d) Exemptions: The redaction requirement does not apply to the filings set forth in

Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1(b)(1)-(9).

(See LR 8.1) Last Revised 10/2/17. See Historical Notes for full revision history.

Provenance

Source
www.ohnd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
94c911a4a508a0619bc8f8e161e797626de9e2a9f088b375bd76c463360a146d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.