Bindinglaw

US · rules

W.D.N.Y. Loc. R. Crim. P. 55

Sealing of Documents in Criminal Cases

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Except where restrictions are imposed by statute or rule, there is a presumption that Court

documents are accessible to the public and that a substantial showing is necessary to

restrict access.

(b) When the sealing of a criminal matter is ordered, the Clerk of Court shall inscribe in the

public records of the Court only the case number, the fact that a case was filed under seal,

the name of the District Judge or Magistrate Judge who ordered the seal, and (after

assignment of the case to a District Judge and a Magistrate Judge in the normal fashion)

the names of the assigned District Judge and the assigned Magistrate Judge.

(c) Documents authorized to be filed under seal or pursuant to a protective order shall comply

with the procedures set forth in the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Guide which is

located on the Court’s website, http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov.

(d) A party seeking to have a document, party, or case sealed shall comply with the procedures

set forth in the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Guide which is located on the

Court’s website, http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov.

(e) Unless otherwise directed by the Court, a sealed document or case shall remain sealed

even after final disposition of the case. A party seeking to have a sealed document

unsealed must seek relief by motion on notice.

Provenance

Source
www.nywd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
e1d5a4518a6c89c14d229d3e604d61c2a309535ab2908f59ececd6214cd76682
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.