Bindinglaw

US · rules

S.D.N.Y. Local Patent Rule 7

Invalidity Contentions

activein force · 2026-01-02 – presentact-effective-date

Unless otherwise specified by the court, not later than 45 days after service of the

“Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions,” each party opposing a

claim of patent infringement must serve on all parties its “Invalidity Contentions,” if

any. Invalidity Contentions must identify each item of prior art that the party contends

allegedly anticipates or renders obvious each asserted claim, and any other grounds of

invalidity, including any under 35 U.S.C. § 101 or § 112, or unenforceability of any of the

asserted claims.

Provenance

Source
www.nysd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
d781114042e7d52e8c5f32ed7718708945d258f5f5e63ecfafa81fc4afc26d70
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
S.D.N.Y. Local Patent Rule 7 — Invalidity Contentions · binding.law