Bindinglaw

US · rules

S.D.N.Y. Local Civil Rule 81.1

Removal of Cases from State Courts

activein force · 2026-01-02 – presentact-effective-date

If the court’s jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, and regardless of whether

or not service of process has been effected on all parties, the notice of removal must set

forth:

(a) in the case of each individual named as a party, that party’s residence and

domicile and any state or other jurisdiction of which that party is a citizen for

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1332;

(b) in the case of each party that is a partnership, limited liability partnership,

limited liability company, or other unincorporated association, like

information for all of its partners or members, as well as the state or other

jurisdiction of its formation;

(c) in the case of each party that is a corporation, its state or other jurisdiction of

incorporation, principal place of business, and any state or other jurisdiction

of which that party is a citizen for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1332;

(d) in the case of an assigned claim, corresponding information for each original

owner of the claim and for each assignee; and

(e) the date on which each party that has been served was served.

For relevant historical context for this local rule, consult the Appendix of Committee Notes.

History

PRE-2024 COMMITTEE NOTE The Committee recommends the deletion of Local Civil Rule 81.1(b), because 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a) already provides that the removing party or parties shall file with the notice of removal “a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant or defendants in such action.” The Committee recommends that Local Civil Rule 81.1(a) be reworded, in the same manner as Local Civil Rule 26.1, to describe with greater specificity the information needed to assess the presence of diversity jurisdiction. 2024 COMMITTEE NOTE Because the removing party must have a good-faith basis for asserting diversity jurisdiction at the time of removal, the Committee deletes language suggesting that a party may rely on post-removal discovery to establish such jurisdiction.

Provenance

Source
www.nysd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
b7b9c4e6e547de1739972cdc2da224a7a2c7df0e7bc42a4a7f9851be3d57031b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.