Bindinglaw

US · rules

N.D.N.Y. L.R. 67.4

Refund of Overpayments

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

The Clerk of the Court or his designee is authorized to refund duplicate filing, admission,

or biennial fees. In addition, the Clerk of the Court or his designee is authorized to refund

overpayments made in criminal cases, such as duplicate or overpayments for Special

Assessments, Fines, and Restitution, after confirming that the account has been paid in full, or

the defendant’s portion of Court-ordered restitution has been paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court or his designee is authorized to make a refund if an erroneous

payment is discovered by the Court or the Clerk’s Office, or if a party or its counsel files a

written request for a refund. Instructions for filing a request for a refund are available on the

Court’s website at www.nynd.uscourts.gov.

A party or its counsel may request a refund by notifying the Clerk of the Court of its

request by completing the Request for Refund of Fees Paid electronic form found on the Court’s

website. If the Clerk of the Court verifies the error, he will process the refund by government

check if the party or its counsel made the original payment in cash, by debit card, or by check. If

the party or its counsel made the original payment by credit card, the Clerk of the Court shall

initiate a refund request through Pay.gov in the form of a credit to the credit card from which the

original payment was made.

Provenance

Source
www.nynd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
87b4b7a54c7ed611d316b971deab502e1b04dd4be52bfb3f258a4025d610611d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.