Bindinglaw

US · rules

N.D.N.Y. L.R. 47.6

Social Media Juror Inquiries

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Attorneys may use websites available to the public, including social media

websites, for juror or prospective juror research, so long as:

1. The website or information is available and accessible to the public;

2. The attorney does not send an access request to a juror’s electronic social

media;

3. No direct communication or contact occurs between the attorney and a

juror or prospective juror as a result of the research, including, but not

limited to, Facebook “friend” requests, Twitter or Instagram “follow”

requests, LinkedIn “connection” requests, or other forms of internet and

social media contact;

4. Social media research is done anonymously. For example, a search on a

social media site must not disclose to the juror who is making the inquiry,

and it must only seek information available and accessible to the public

and not the result of an attorney’s account on said social media site; and

5. Deception is not used to gain access to any website or to obtain any

information.

(b) Third parties working for the benefit of or on behalf of any attorney must comply

with all the same restrictions as set forth above for attorneys.

(c) If an attorney becomes aware of a juror’s posting on the internet about the case in

which she or he is serving, the attorney shall report the issue to the court.

Provenance

Source
www.nynd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
d1023e7bdf348a8587270e9a40015c4e005318c82f4b3c57a222e18de359fb1b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.