Bindinglaw

US · rules

E.D.N.Y. Local Civil Rule 56.2

Notice to Pro Se Litigant Who Opposes a Summary Judgment

activein force · 2026-01-02 – presentact-effective-date

Any represented party moving for summary judgment against a party proceeding pro

se must serve and file as a separate document, together with the papers in support of

the motion, the following “Notice to Pro Se Litigant Who Opposes a Motion for

Summary Judgment” with the full texts of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Civil Rule 56.1

attached. Where the pro se party is not the plaintiff, the movant must amend the form

notice as necessary to reflect that fact.

NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT WHO OPPOSES A MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

The defendant in this case has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This means that the defendant has asked the court to

decide this case without a trial, based on written materials, including affidavits,

submitted in support of the motion. THE CLAIMS YOU ASSERT IN YOUR

COMPLAINT MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT A TRIAL IF YOU DO NOT RESPOND

TO THIS MOTION ON TIME by filing sworn affidavits and/or other documents as

required by Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and by Local Civil Rule

56.1. The full text of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule

56.1 is attached.

In short, Rule 56 provides that you may NOT oppose summary judgment simply by

relying on the allegations in your complaint. Rather, you must submit evidence, such as

witness statements or documents, countering the facts asserted by the defendant and

raising specific facts that support your claim. If you have proof of your claim, now is the

time to submit it. Any witness statements must be in the form of affidavits. An affidavit

is a sworn statement of fact based on personal knowledge stating facts that would be

admissible in evidence at trial. You may submit your own affidavit and/or the affidavits

of others. You may submit affidavits that were prepared specifically in response to

defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

If you do not respond to the motion for summary judgment on time with affidavits

and/or documents contradicting the material facts asserted by the defendant, the court

may accept defendant’s facts as true. Your case may be dismissed and judgment may be

entered in defendant’s favor without a trial.

If you have any questions, you may direct them to the Pro Se Office.

For relevant historical context for this local rule, consult the Appendix of Committee Notes.

History

Judgment PRE-2024 COMMITTEE NOTE Local Civil Rule 56.2 plays a valuable role in alerting pro se litigants to the potentially serious consequences of a motion for summary judgment, and to the requirements for opposing such a motion. The Committee recommends certain changes in the text of the notice required by the rule in order to make it more understandable to non-lawyers.

Provenance

Source
www.nyed.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
344d59a0cd2c48d2cab82de92fd354ceebbbf21082f322e3ea4cbfe9b76844c9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
E.D.N.Y. Local Civil Rule 56.2 — Notice to Pro Se Lit… · binding.law