Bindinglaw

US · rules

D.N. Mar. I. LR 1.4

Calendaring Conflicts

activein force · 2017-11-01 – presentact-effective-date

a. Counsel’s Duty to Notify Court. Within 48 hours of learning of a scheduling

conflict between this Court and any other court, counsel must notify the presiding

judge or a clerk of this Court. The judge may confer with judges of the other court

in an effort to resolve the conflict. While neither this Court nor any other court

has priority in scheduling, the judge may consider the following factors in resolving

the conflict:

1. whether a case is criminal, with attendant speedy trial concerns, or civil;

2. whether off-island witnesses, parties, or counsel are scheduled to attend a

hearing;

3. the age of the case;

4. which matter was set first; and,

5. any other factor that weighs in favor of one court or case over the other.

Provenance

Source
www.nmid.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
4a48a13c84edd9bd4574e944a2cc48518a32705fee4736bc4bf7532472a59bbe
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.N. Mar. I. LR 1.4 — Calendaring Conflicts · binding.law