US · rules
D.N.M.LR-Civ. 26.3
Required Disclosures
All provisions of FED. R. CIV. P. 26 are applicable to actions in
this District, unless specifically exempted by local rule.
(a) Exemptions from Initial Disclosures. The following are exempted:
(1) all disclosure in cases excluded from case management procedures by D.N.M.LR-Civ. 16.3; and
(2) disclosure of experts having knowledge of the case who are used for the sole
purpose of case preparation and not as witnesses.
(b) Exemption from Expert Report Disclosure. Unless otherwise ordered by the
Court, a party must provide the written reports required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)
only as to experts retained or specially employed by a party to provide expert
testimony. Such reports need not be provided as to hybrid fact/expert witnesses such
as treating physicians. The party must disclose the existence of any hybrid fact/expert
witness pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(A) and disclose the subject matter on
which the expert witness is expected to present evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 702, 703,
or 705, as well as a summary of the facts and opinions to which the hybrid fact/expert
witness is expected to testify, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 26(a)(2)(C).
(c) Exemption When Joint Status Report Filed. When required disclosures have
previously been made in the Joint Status Report pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 16.1, the
required disclosures pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 26 may incorporate portions of the
Joint Status Report.
(d) Required Initial Disclosure. In all cases in which the physical or mental medical
condition of a party is an issue, the party whose condition is an issue must make a
good faith effort to produce the following information that the disclosing party may
use to support its claims or defenses, unless solely for impeachment:
(1) a list of the name, address and phone number of any healthcare provider, including
without limitation, any physicians, dentists, chiropractors, mental health
counselors, clinics and hospitals which have treated the party within the last five
(5) years preceding the date of the occurrence set forth in the pleadings and
continuing through the current date;
(2) all records of such healthcare providers which are already in that party's
possession, which will be made available for inspection and copying by all other
parties to the action;
(3) for each healthcare provider, a signed authorization to release medical records
form, as set forth in Appendix "A." Within fourteen (14) days after receiving
medical records by use of these authorization forms, a party must make the records
available for inspection and copying by all other parties to the action.
(e) Duties in Responding to Initial Disclosures. When information, records or a release
subject to this rule is withheld on a claim that it is privileged or subject to objection, or
that disclosure is prohibited by regulation or statute, the claim must be made expressly
in writing and must be supported by a description of the nature of the documents, or
things not produced that is sufficient to enable the demanding party to contest the
claim.
Provenance
- Source
- www.nmd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
c449d372b1bd21266da5209bc124aa71cab0e802a833b4465d18c2759dfbc481
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.