Bindinglaw

US · rules

D.N.J. L. Civ. R. 37.1

Discovery Motions

activein force · 2013-06-19 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Conference to Resolve Disputes

(1) Counsel shall confer to resolve any discovery dispute. Any such dispute not resolved shall be

presented by telephone conference call or letter to the Magistrate Judge. This presentation shall precede any

formal motion.

(2) Cases in which a party appears pro se shall not be subject to L.Civ.R. 37.1(a)(1) unless the

Magistrate Judge so directs. In such cases discovery disputes shall be presented by formal motion consistent

with L.Civ.R. 37.1(b).

(b) Discovery Motions

(1) Discovery motions must be accompanied by an affidavit, or other document complying with

28 U.S.C. § 1746, certifying that the moving party has conferred with the opposing party in a good faith effort

to resolve by agreement the issues raised by the motion without the intervention of the Court and that the parties

have been unable to reach agreement. The affidavit, or other document complying with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, shall

set forth the date and method of communication used in attempting to reach agreement.

(2) Discovery motions shall have annexed thereto copies of only those pertinent portions of

depositions, interrogatories, demands for admission and responses, etc., which are the subject matter of the

motion.

(3) L.Civ.R. 7.1 shall apply to discovery motions, except that no reply papers shall be allowed

except with the permission of the Magistrate Judge. Unless oral argument is to be heard under L.Civ.R.

37.1(b)(4), the Magistrate Judge may decide the motion on the basis of the papers received when the deadline

for submitting opposition has expired.

(4) No oral argument shall be heard except as permitted expressly by the Magistrate Judge assigned

to hear the motion. In the event oral argument is required, the parties shall be notified by the Court. Oral

argument may be conducted in open court or by telephone conference, at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge.

Any party who believes that a discovery motion requires oral argument shall request it in the notice of motion

or in response to the notice of motion, and so notify the Court in writing at the time the motion or opposition

thereto is filed.

History

Amended: March 1, 2010; June 19, 2013.

Provenance

Source
www.njd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
405c8afa17ac0890c7fb06ab39b0aca8d3e10bc6725a2985a83f5e54564b558e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.