US · rules
W.D.N.C. LCrR 49.1.2
Filing of Papers, Filing of Redacted Pleadings, and Presenting Judgments, Orders, and Other Communications to Judges
(a) Place of Conventional Filing, when Allowed. Where conventional filing is
permitted by the Administrative Procedures or by the assigned judge, all papers may be filed in
Asheville, Charlotte, or Statesville, regardless of the division in which the case is pending.
(b) Presenting Judgments, Orders, and Other Communications to Judges. As
provided by the Administrative Procedures, parties may submit proposed orders, memoranda of
decision, judgments, bills of costs, and other proposed documents for consideration and entry by
the Court or the Clerk of Court. Such proposed documents must be submitted through Cyberclerk
and may also be submitted as attachments to a motion, brief, or notice that relates to the proposed
relief sought. In any event, such proposed document must be served on all parties as provided by
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, unless an exception is provided for proceeding ex parte under the Federal Rules
of Criminal Procedure.
History
Advisory Committee Notes The requirements for electronic filing in Sections (b) and (c) were redundant. Section (c) has been amended to address the place of filing when conventional filing is permitted. Former section (d) has been eliminated as has its civil analogue in LCvR 5.2.1(d). The Rule has been moved to its present location to better correspond with the corresponding Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure.
Provenance
- Source
- www.ncwd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
13b97d806e4fa6923c994a30dc4b0750678f7a617626a611694fe24b25b14663
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.