Bindinglaw

US · rules

M.D.N.C. LR 7.6

Evidentiary Objections to Factual Allegations Contained in Memoranda or Replies Supporting Motions to Dismiss, Motions for Summary Judgment, and Other Motions

activein force · 2026-06-01 – presentact-effective-date

Rather than filing a motion to strike, a party may assert evidentiary objections in

its response or reply memorandum to factual allegations contained in memoranda or

replies supporting or opposing motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, and

other motions. If an evidentiary objection is raised in the non-moving party's response

memorandum, the moving party may address the objection in its reply memorandum.

The non-moving party may not file further briefing on its evidentiary objection. If an

evidentiary objection is raised by the moving party in its reply memorandum, the non-moving party may file a surreply memorandum pursuant to this subparagraph within

seven (7) days addressing only the evidentiary objection. The moving party may not file

further briefing on its evidentiary objection. If a party asserts an evidentiary objection in

a motion to strike evidence, no reply memorandum is permitted. If a separate motion to

strike is filed asserting evidentiary objections, the motion to strike may be summarily

denied by the Court, and any issues instead addressed in the ruling on the underlying

motion.

Provenance

Source
www.ncmd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
4a848265b25639e6210d46db7158d225c21d3de386928ab8f8ab179738a15574
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
M.D.N.C. LR 7.6 — Evidentiary Objections to Factual A… · binding.law