US · rules
E.D.N.C. Local Civil Rule 56.1
Motions for Summary Judgment
(a) Statement of Material Facts on Motion for Summary Judgment.
(1) Movant’s Statement. Any motion for summary judgment pursuant
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 shall be supported by a separate
statement, in numbered paragraphs, of the material facts as to which
the movant contends there is no genuine dispute.
(2) Opposing Statement. The memorandum opposing a motion for
summary judgment shall be supported by a separate statement that
includes a response to each numbered paragraph in the movant’s
statement in correspondingly numbered paragraphs and, if necessary,
additional paragraphs containing a statement of additional material
facts as to which the opposing party contends there is a genuine
dispute. Each numbered paragraph in the movant’s statement of
material facts will be deemed admitted for purposes of the motion
unless it is specifically controverted by a correspondingly numbered
paragraph in the opposing statement.
(3) Reply Statement. When a party opposing summary
judgment submits a statement of additional material facts as to which
it contends there is a genuine dispute, the movant may submit a reply
statement of additional facts limited to the additional facts referenced
in the statement submitted by the party opposing summary judgment.
(4) Citations. Each statement by the movant or opponent pursuant to
this Local Civil Rule must be followed by citation to evidence that
would be admissible, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
56(c). Citations shall identify with specificity the relevant page and
paragraph or line number of the evidence cited.
(5) Appendix. All evidence cited in moving or opposing statements,
such as affidavits, relevant deposition testimony, responses to
discovery requests, or other documents, shall be filed as an appendix
to the statement of facts prescribed by subsections (a)(1) or (2) of this
rule and denominated “Plaintiff’s/Defendant’s Appendix to Local
Civil Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts.”
(b) Exceptional Cases.
Where a party believes that compliance with this Local Civil Rule will be
exceptionally burdensome or is otherwise inappropriate, the party may
include a request for modification of or exemption from its requirements as
part of the Rule 26(f) report to the court or by separate motion.
(c) Cross-referencing.
Memoranda in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment
as required by Local Civil Rule 7.1 or 7.2 may cross-reference or cite to the
statement and appendix prescribed by this Local Civil Rule without repeating
the contents thereof.
Provenance
- Source
- www.nced.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
bdca75dc79b99d1b532fa479a396a7fe8968f2dd840dcdfad424d5a7407bfba7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.