Bindinglaw

US · rules

E.D.N.C. Local Civil Rule 16.1

Final Civil Pretrial Conference

activein force · 2023-05-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Scheduling and Notice.

A final pretrial conference shall be scheduled in every civil action after the

time for discovery has expired. In most actions, the clerk shall give at least

45 days’ notice of such conference. In the court’s discretion and upon

request of any party or on the court’s own initiative, a preliminary or

“working” pretrial conference may be scheduled.

(b) Preparation for Final Pretrial Conference.

(1) At least 28 days before the pretrial conference, all parties must

provide to all other parties the pretrial disclosures required under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3). Twenty-one days before the pretrial conference,

a party may designate and serve any objections listed in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 26(a)(3). The parties’ Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures, and objections

thereto, shall be incorporated into the final pretrial order, consistent

with subsection (c) of this rule. The pretrial order must be submitted

to the court 7 days prior to the pretrial conference.

(2) In preparing for the pretrial conference, the parties shall confer and

prepare a proposed pretrial order. It shall be the duty of the plaintiff

to arrange for the parties to confer for the purpose of preparing a

proposed pretrial order. Where video depositions are to be used,

parties should endeavor to reach early agreement on editing; where

agreement cannot be reached, required rulings by the court should be

sought in sufficient time to allow for final edited versions of

depositions to be used at trial.

(c) Form of Pretrial Order.

The pretrial order shall be prepared in one sequential document without

reference to attached exhibits or schedules and shall contain the following in

5 separate sections, numbered by roman numerals as indicated:

(1) Stipulations. Stipulations covering jurisdiction, joinder, capacity of

the parties, relevant and material facts, legal issues, and factual

issues.

(2) Contentions. Contentions covering matters on which the parties

have been unable to stipulate, including jurisdiction, misjoinder,

capacity of the parties, relevant and material facts, legal issues, and

factual issues. Claims and defenses as to which no contentions are

listed in the pretrial order are deemed abandoned.

(3) Exhibits. A list of exhibits that each party may offer at trial,

including any map or diagram, numbered sequentially; exhibit

numbers shall remain the same throughout all further proceedings.

Copies of all exhibits shall be provided to the opposing party not later

than the conference provided for in subsection (b) of this rule. The

court may excuse the copying of large maps or other exhibits. Except

as otherwise indicated in the pretrial order, it will be deemed that all

parties stipulate that all exhibits are authentic and may be admitted

into evidence without further identification or proof. Grounds for

objection as to authenticity or admissibility must be set forth in the

pretrial order. When practicable, trial exhibits should carry the same

number as in the depositions and references to exhibits in depositions

should be changed to refer to the trial exhibit number. It is not

necessary to designate exhibits that are to be used solely for

impeachment or cross-examination. Except as otherwise indicated in

the pretrial order or ordered by the court, a party may use any exhibit

in opening statements, provided that the exhibit has been listed in the

pretrial order, and (a) the opposing party has not objected to it, or (b)

any such objection has been overruled prior to opening statement.

(4) Designation of Pleadings and Discovery Materials. The

designation of all portions of pleadings and discovery materials,

including depositions, interrogatories, and requests for admission

that each party may offer at trial, shall be noted by reference, where

applicable, to document volume, page number, and line. Objection

by the opposing party shall be noted by reference, where applicable,

to document volume, page number, and line, and the reasons for such

objection shall be stated. It is not necessary to designate any portion

of a pleading, deposition, or any other discovery material that is to be

used solely for impeachment or cross-examination.

(5) Witnesses. A list of the names and addresses of all witnesses each

party may offer at trial, together with a brief statement of what the

party proposes to establish by their testimony.

(d) Conduct of the Final Pretrial Conference.

(1) Purpose. To resolve any disputes concerning the contents of the

pretrial order.

(2) Preparation. The parties shall be fully prepared to present to the

court all information and documentation necessary for completion of

the final pretrial order. Failure to do so shall result in the sanctions

provided by this local rule.

(3) Pretrial Order. All parties shall be responsible for presenting the

final proposed pretrial order, properly signed by all parties, at a time

designated by the court.

(e) Penalty for Noncompliance.

A person’s failure to comply with the provisions of this local rule may

result in the imposition against that person of a monetary fine not to exceed

$250.00, any other sanction allowable by the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, or both.

(f) Sample Pretrial Order.

A pretrial order in the following form shall be sufficient to comply with

subsection (c) of this rule:. [The case caption should be in the form provided

as an example in Local Civil Rule 10.1.]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

WESTERN DIVISION

No. 5:94-CV-125-F

JOHN DOE, by his guardian )

ad litem, and JANE DOE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) PRETRIAL ORDER

)

XYZ CORPORATION, )

)

Defendant. )

Date of Conference: August 12, 1998

Appearances: Jane Y. Lawyer, Raleigh, North Carolina for plaintiff;

Sam X. Attorney, Fayetteville, North Carolina for defendant.

I. STIPULATIONS.

A. all parties are properly before the court;

B. the court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter;

C. all parties have been correctly designated;

D. there is no question as to misjoinder or nonjoinder of parties;

E. plaintiff, a minor, appears through his or her guardian;

F. Facts:

1. Plaintiff is a citizen of Wake County, North Carolina.

2. Defendant is a New York corporation, licensed to do business and doing business

in the State of North Carolina.

G. Legal Issues:

May a nine-year old minor be guilty of contributory negligence?

H. Factual Issues:

1. Was plaintiff injured and damaged by the negligence of defendant?

2. What amount, if any, is plaintiff entitled to receive of defendant as compensatory

damages?

II. CONTENTIONS.

A. Plaintiff

1. Facts:

(a) That Richard Roe was driving defendant’s truck as defendant’s agent.

(b) That Richard Roe was negligent in that he drove at an excessive speed and

while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

2. Factual Issues:

What amount, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover of defendant as punitive

damages?

B. Defendant

1. Facts:

That Richard Roe, a former employee, took defendant’s truck without authorization

and, at the time of the accident, was not the agent or employee of defendant.

2. Factual Issues:

Did plaintiff, by his or her own negligence, contribute to his or her injury and

damage?

III. EXHIBITS.

A. Plaintiff

Number Title Objection

l Patrol Report Hearsay

2 Photo of Plaintiff

B. Defendant

Number Title Objection

l Photo of Scene

2 Scale Model

IV. DESIGNATION OF PLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY MATERIALS.

A. Plaintiff

Document Portion Objection Reason

Plaintiff’s Nos. 1, 8 and No. 8 Privilege

first set of 9

interrogatories

Deposition Vol. 1, line Line 6, p. 1 Hearsay

of Richard Roe 6, p. 1 thru thru line 2,

line 5, p. 6 p. 7

B. Defendant

None

V. WITNESSES.

A. Plaintiff

Name Address Proposed Testimony

John Jones 615 Rains Street Facts surrounding

Raleigh, NC accident

Frank Flake Selma, NC Speed of defendant’s

vehicle, intoxication of driver

B. Defendant

All witnesses listed by plaintiff.

Name Address Proposed Testimony

Sam Smith 4 Appian Way Facts surrounding the

Rome, Italy theft by driver of the vehicle

TRIAL TIME ESTIMATE: days

/s/ Jane Y. Lawyer

JANE Y. LAWYER

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Sam. S. Attorney

SAM X. ATTORNEY

Attorney for Defendant

APPROVED BY:

___________________________

BILL SMITH

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

, 201___.

Provenance

Source
www.nced.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
563554660e12c2aa1819b5bf6dbe7b061e0dfe30c7f5b3aac63f0234fd4d49e8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.