Bindinglaw

US · rules

D. Mont. L.R. 7.3

Motion for Reconsideration

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Leave of Court Required. No one may file a motion for

reconsideration of an interlocutory order without prior leave of court.

(b) Form and Content of Motion for Leave. A motion for leave to file a

motion for reconsideration may seek reconsideration only of an interlocutory order,

must be limited to 2,275 words or, for pro se litigants, seven pages, and must

specify why it meets at least one of the following:

(1) (A) the facts or applicable law are materially different from the facts

or applicable law that the parties presented to the court before

entry of the order for which reconsideration is sought, and

(B) despite the exercise of reasonable diligence, the party applying

for reconsideration did not know such fact or law before entry

25 | P a g e

D.Mont L.R. 7.3 Motion for Reconsideration

of the order; or

(2) new material facts arose or a change of law occurred after entry of the

order.

(c) Prohibition Against Repetition of Argument. No motion for leave to

file a motion for reconsideration of an interlocutory order may repeat any oral or

written argument made by the applying party before entry of the order. Violation of

this restriction subjects the offending party to appropriate sanctions.

(d) Response. Unless the presiding judge orders a response, no response

may be filed to a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration.

Provenance

Source
www.mtd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
62e7623f6eced4c0e625d6ef10ff84732515e10655438d87aad3200d8e7241eb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D. Mont. L.R. 7.3 — Motion for Reconsideration · binding.law