US · rules
D. Mont. L.R. 7.3
Motion for Reconsideration
(a) Leave of Court Required. No one may file a motion for
reconsideration of an interlocutory order without prior leave of court.
(b) Form and Content of Motion for Leave. A motion for leave to file a
motion for reconsideration may seek reconsideration only of an interlocutory order,
must be limited to 2,275 words or, for pro se litigants, seven pages, and must
specify why it meets at least one of the following:
(1) (A) the facts or applicable law are materially different from the facts
or applicable law that the parties presented to the court before
entry of the order for which reconsideration is sought, and
(B) despite the exercise of reasonable diligence, the party applying
for reconsideration did not know such fact or law before entry
25 | P a g e
D.Mont L.R. 7.3 Motion for Reconsideration
of the order; or
(2) new material facts arose or a change of law occurred after entry of the
order.
(c) Prohibition Against Repetition of Argument. No motion for leave to
file a motion for reconsideration of an interlocutory order may repeat any oral or
written argument made by the applying party before entry of the order. Violation of
this restriction subjects the offending party to appropriate sanctions.
(d) Response. Unless the presiding judge orders a response, no response
may be filed to a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mtd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
62e7623f6eced4c0e625d6ef10ff84732515e10655438d87aad3200d8e7241eb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.