US · rules
D. Mont. L.R. 16.5
Alternative Dispute Resolution
(a) Mediation and Evaluation.
(1) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 651 et seq., the court encourages mediation
and neutral evaluation as alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”)
procedures. Parties must consider using ADR procedures at an
appropriate point in the litigation. Parties may engage in ADR with or
without the assistance of the court.
(A) Mediation is a non-binding process in which an impartial third
party assists the parties in reaching an agreed settlement. A
settlement conference is mediation conducted by a judicial
officer. A mediator may confer separately and privately with
any party during a session.
(B) Neutral evaluation is a non-binding process in which the parties
38 | P a g e
D.Mont L.R. 16.5 Alternative Dispute Resolution
present summaries of their cases to an evaluator, who assesses
the parties’ legal positions and provides them with an impartial
evaluation of the case. The evaluator may help the parties
identify areas of agreement, provide case planning guidance,
and assist in negotiating a settlement.
(2) The chief deputy clerk of court must annually prepare a statement for
the Chief Judge regarding the District’s use of ADR procedures.
(b) General Rules.
(1) Case Management Responsibility. The presiding judge retains case
management responsibility at all times. Where a case is referred to a
magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings, the magistrate judge is
the presiding judge.
(2) Confidentiality. All settlement proceedings are confidential.
Attorneys, participants, mediators, and evaluators must preserve the
confidentiality of all communications made in the course of ADR
procedures.
(3) Mediators and Evaluators. All persons serving as mediators or
evaluators under this rule are performing quasi-judicial functions and
are entitled to the immunities and protections accorded by law to
persons serving in such capacity.
(4) Obligation of Good Faith.
(A) Each party must ensure that a person with ultimate settlement
authority attends and participates in any ADR procedure
ordered by the presiding judge. A unit or agency of government
satisfies this attendance requirement if represented by a person
who has, to the greatest extent feasible, authority to settle and
who is knowledgeable about the facts of the case, the
governmental unit’s position, and the procedures and policies
under which the governmental unit decides whether to accept
proposed settlements.
(B) Failure to participate in good faith may result in the imposition
of sanctions against the offending party.
39 | P a g e
D.Mont L.R. 16.5 Alternative Dispute Resolution
(5) Notification of Settlement. When a case is settled, the parties must
immediately notify the court by filing a notice in the case.
(c) Motions and Orders for ADR.
(1) The presiding judge may, sua sponte or on the motion of a party, order
the parties to participate in mediation or neutral evaluation.
(2) The presiding judge will select the mediator or evaluator and may
select any person not involved in the case.
(3) The presiding judge or a judicial mediator or evaluator may issue
appropriate orders to govern the proceedings. A non-judicial mediator
or evaluator may set forth the governing procedures in a letter to the
parties. Such letters will not be filed in the record of the case.
40 | P a g e
D.Mont L.R. 16.5 Alternative Dispute Resolution
Provenance
- Source
- www.mtd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
1a1ad8c51d1dec7b3a5584af1f29bdbb2ec6fb675843946fffe028533aada92e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.