US · rules
S.D. Miss. L.U. Civ. R. 54
Judgment; Costs
(a) Postponement in Advance of Trial. Whenever a civil action scheduled for jury
trial is required to be postponed, or is settled, or otherwise is disposed of in
advance of trial, then jury costs, including mileage and per diem, may, in the
court’s discretion, be assessed equally against the parties and their counsel or
otherwise assessed as directed by the court, unless the court is notified at least one
full business day before the day on which the action is scheduled for trial so that
the jurors can be notified that it will not be necessary for them to attend.
(b) Postponement After the Case is Called. Whenever a civil action is postponed,
settled, or otherwise disposed of after the case is called and before the verdict of
the jury, the court may assess jury costs, as described in subparagraph (a), equally
against the parties and their counsel, or against the party responsible for the
postponement or late settlement.
(c) Bill of Costs. In all civil actions in which costs are allowed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1920 in the final judgment as defined in FED. R. CIV. P. 54(a), the prevailing
party to whom costs are awarded must file the bill of costs not later than 30 days
after entry of judgment. Unless the court directs otherwise, a motion for review of
or objecting to the taxation of costs is subject to the requirements of L.U. CIV. R.
7(b). Except as provided by statute or rule, an appeal of the final judgment does
not affect the taxation of costs.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mssd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
54efae0cae6050455bac4d88c561f706f0cf0bd2dfe6d52fb0af515bfd4cd61c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.