US · rules
W.D. Mo. L.R. 37.1
Discovery Motions
(a) Attorneys Must Attempt to Resolve Discovery Disputes on Their Own before
Requesting Court Intervention. Unless the Court orders otherwise, no party may
file a discovery motion until:
1. An attorney for the prospective moving party has, in good faith, conferred or
attempted to confer by telephone or in person with opposing counsel
concerning the matter. The attorney must do more than merely write a demand
letter.
2. If the issues remain unresolved after the attorney has satisfied Rule 37.1(a)(1),
the attorney must arrange with the Court for an immediate telephone
conference with the judge and opposing counsel. When communicating with
the Court, the attorney for the prospective moving party must certify
compliance with this Rule. The attorney may not file a written discovery
motion until after this telephone conference.
(b) Exception. Rule 37.1(a) does not apply to an initial motion requesting the Court
compel or deny discovery pursuant to a subpoena issued under the District’s authority
if the primary case is pending in another district. Once such a motion has been filed
and a miscellaneous case is initiated within the District, the parties are then subject to
Rule 37.1(a). Rule 37.1(a) also does not initially apply to a third-party subpoena
issued in a case pending in this District. The third party may file a motion to quash
the subpoena. The Judge may resolve the motion to quash based upon the briefing or
pursuant to Rule 37.1(a).
Provenance
- Source
- www.mow.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
72319aa2a9a5f242606935ad2e66ea47b28b3bbf9a81fae7b1001811de5f68b7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.