Bindinglaw

US · rules

W.D. Mich. LGenR 4.1

Facility and environs

activein force · 2026-08-13 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Security screening; definitions; requirements

(i) As used in this rule, "federal court facility" includes any facility occupied

by the United States District Court or any temporary facility occupied by a

judge serving in the Western District of Michigan.

(ii) All persons entering a federal court facility in the Western District of

Michigan are required to present a valid government issued identification

card with photo, pass through a security screening device, and have all

belongings and packages subject to physical and/or security screening

examination by the United States Marshals Service, court security officers,

and employees of the Federal Protective Service. Any person who refuses

to present a valid form of identification or pass through screening shall be

denied entrance.

(iii) Consent to provisions - Any person bringing in an electronic

communication device as defined in LGenR 4.3(a) shall be determined to

have consented to the provisions of this rule.

(b) Soliciting, loitering, and disruptive behavior

(i) The solicitation of business relating to bail bonds or to employment as

counsel is prohibited.

(ii) Loitering in or about federal court facilities is prohibited.

(iii) Any behavior that impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of the business

of the court is prohibited. Signs, placards, or banners may not be brought

into a federal court facility or its environs.

(c) Recording of court proceedings

(i) Except as specifically provided herein, the recording of any proceeding is

prohibited and no camera or recording device shall be permitted in a federal

court facility. This prohibition shall include any device or contrivance

capable of preserving or transmitting a visual image and any device or

contrivance capable of recording, transmitting, or preserving any audible

communication (except cell phones with camera features).

(ii) The taking of photographs or video or audio recordings in connection with

any judicial proceeding and the recording or broadcasting of judicial

proceedings by radio, television or any other means is prohibited.

(A) As used in this rule, "judicial proceeding" includes proceedings

before district, bankruptcy or magistrate judges, and sessions of the

grand jury.

(B) As used in this rule, "in connection with any judicial proceeding"

includes all participants in a judicial proceeding while they are in a

courtroom or its environs.

(iii) A judicial officer may authorize, by written notice to the United States

Marshals Service, the use of electronic or photographic means for the

presentation of evidence or for the perpetuation of the record.

(iv) A judge may authorize, by written notice to the United States Marshals

Service:

(A) the broadcasting, televising, recording, or photographing of

investiture, ceremonial, or naturalization proceedings; and

(B) the radio or television broadcasting, audio or video recording or

photographing of court proceedings pursuant to a resolution of the

Judicial Conference of the United States.

(v) By written notice to the United States Marshals Service, the General

Services Administration (GSA) property manager or his or her designee

may authorize an individual or contract group to possess a camera or

recording device for the purpose of maintaining or enhancing the facility, to

include repair and alterations.

Provenance

Source
www.miwd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
4a42aaacdc1749f017668ff669dd86e58b10bfe1af940fd7b1c45297771f2002
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.