US · rules
D. Me. Loc. R. 16.2
Scheduling Order
(a) Issuance
The Court will issue a proposed scheduling order in all cases except social
security disability cases, habeas corpus petitions, bankruptcy appeals, and any
other case or category of cases as the Court may order.
(b) Contents
(1) The proposed scheduling order will identify the case management track
to which the case is assigned.
(2) In Standard Track cases, the proposed scheduling order will set
deadlines to: serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(a)(1); join other parties and amend the pleadings; file
motions; disclose experts and complete discovery; and complete other
pretrial preparation. The order will also set dates for the parties to
exchange written settlement demands and responses and will identify
the month in which the case should be ready for trial.
(3) In Standard Track cases, the proposed scheduling order will limit
discovery for each separately represented party to: 30 interrogatories
(subparts not permitted); 30 requests for admission; 2 sets of requests
for the production of documents; and 5 depositions.
(4) In Complex Track cases, after discussion with the parties, the Court will
enter a scheduling order that addresses discovery, motion practice,
alternative dispute resolution (ADR), and any other matters discussed.
(5) In Administrative Track cases, the proposed scheduling order will
establish deadlines to join other parties, amend the pleadings, and file
motions. This order will also set dates for the parties to exchange written
settlement demands and responses and will identify the month in which
the case should be ready for trial.
(6) In Prisoner Civil Rights Track cases, the proposed scheduling order will
set deadlines to: join other parties and amend the pleadings; file
motions; complete discovery; and complete other pretrial preparation.
This order will also set dates for the parties to exchange written
settlement demands and responses and will identify the month in which
the case should be ready for trial.
(7) In IDEA Track cases, after discussion with the parties, the Court will
enter an order that addresses the administrative record, additional-evidence motion practice, and other matters.
(8) In ERISA Track cases, the proposed scheduling order will set deadlines
to: file the administrative record; file motions to modify the
administrative record, or for discovery, or both; amend the pleadings
and join parties; and file motions for judgment on the record for judicial
review.
(c) Timing
The proposed scheduling order in Standard Track, Administrative Track,
Prisoner Civil Rights Track, and ERISA Track cases will issue as soon as
practicable but not later than 90 days after all defendants have been served
with the complaint or 60 days after all defendants have appeared unless the
Court finds good cause for delay. The scheduling order in Complex Track cases
will issue after a conference with the Court at which discovery, motion practice,
ADR, and other matters will be discussed. The scheduling order in IDEA Track
cases will issue after a conference with the Court at which the administrative
record, additional-evidence motion practice, and other matters will be
discussed.
(d) Objections
Unless a party files an objection to the proposed scheduling order within 21
days of its filing, or within 14 days of its filing in ERISA Track cases, the
proposed order will become the scheduling order required by Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 16(b). A party wishing to alter any deadline or any discovery
limitation of a scheduling order must file an objection to the scheduling order
with a detailed explanation of the reasons for each requested alteration,
request a scheduling conference with the Court, or both. The Court will
promptly schedule a conference if it deems one necessary.
Provenance
- Source
- www.med.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
4b18828bd81effa1c5e0772d0483da6af1d422ef02e93b73d5fa1e7637f3e379
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.