US · rules
D. Md. L.R. 805.1
Cases Involving Claims of Infringement or Invalidity (Including Hatch-
Waxman Cases)
Unless otherwise ordered by the Cout, in all cases covered by L.R. 804.1 through 804.3,
claim construction disclosures and briefing shall proceed as follows:
a) Exchange Proposed Terms for Construction
Fourteen (14) days from the service of the Initial Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions
(or from the service of the Initial Disclosure of Infringement Contentions in cases arising
under the Hatch-Waxman Act), each party shall simultaneously exchange a list of claim
terms, phrases, or clauses which that party contends should be construed or found indefinite
by the Court, and identify any claim element which that party contends should be governed
by pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 112(6) or post-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 112(f).
b) Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence
i. Fourteen (14) days from the exchange of the “Proposed Terms for
Construction,” the parties shall simultaneously exchange a preliminary
proposed construction of each claim term, phrase, or clause which the
parties collectively have identified for claim construction purposes.
Each such “Preliminary Claim Construction” shall also, for each
element which any party contends is governed by pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. §
112(6) or post-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), identify the structure(s), act(s),
or material(s) corresponding to that element.
ii. At the same time the parties exchange their respective “Preliminary
Claim Constructions,” they shall each also provide a preliminary
identification of extrinsic evidence, including without limitation,
dictionary definitions, citations to learned treatises and prior art, and
testimony of percipient and expert witnesses they contend support
their respective claim constructions or indefiniteness positions. The
parties shall identify each such item of extrinsic evidence by production
number or produce a copy of any such item not previously produced.
With respect to any such witness, percipient or expert, the parties shall
also provide the identity and a brief description of the substance of
that witness’ proposed testimony. The parties may, but need not,
exchanges supporting expert declarations at this time.
iii. Within seven (7) days from the exchange of Preliminary Claim
Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence the parties shall meet and confer
(Including Hatch-Waxman Cases) (Including Hatch-Waxman Cases)
to narrow the issues in dispute and exchange revised lists of
terms/constructions.
c) Claim Construction Briefing
i. Not later than thirty-five (35) days from the exchange of the
“Preliminary Claim Construction and Extrinsic Evidence,” each party
shall serve and file an opening brief and any evidence supporting its
claim construction. If any party opposing patent infringement
contends that any claim terms are indefinite, that party shall raise the
issue in its opening claim construction brief. Any expert declaration in
support of a party’s position must be submitted with its opening brief.
All asserted patents shall be attached as exhibits to the opening claim
construction brief in searchable PDF form.
ii. Not later than twenty-eight (28) days from the deadline for filing the
opening brief, each party shall serve and file a responsive brief and
supporting evidence. If any party opposing patent infringement
contended that a claim term is indefinite in its opening brief, each party
asserting patent infringement shall respond to the indefiniteness issue
in its responsive brief. Any expert declaration responding to a party’s
position set forth in its opening brief must be submitted with its
responsive brief.
iii. Not later than fourteen (14) days from the deadline for filing the
responsive brief, each party shall serve and file any reply brief and any
evidence directly rebutting the supporting evidence contained in an
opposing party’s response. No expert declarations may be submitted
with a reply brief without leave of court, and for good cause.
iv. If a party offers the testimony of a witness to support its claim
construction, it must make the witness available for deposition (if the
witness is under the control of the party) concerning the proposed
testimony. Any party may utilize a rebuttal expert in response to a
brief where expert testimony is relied on by the other party. If a
witness is deposed based on a declaration submitted in the responsive
brief, the parties’ deadline for the filing of the reply brief shall be
extended by seven (7) calendar days.
(Including Hatch-Waxman Cases)
d) Joint Claim Construction Statement
Within seven (7) days after the completion of claim construction briefing, the parties,
having met and conferred on claim construction, shall file a Joint Claim Construction
Statement which shall contain the following information:
i. The construction of those claims and terms on which the parties agree;
ii. Each party’s proposed construction of each disputed claim and term;
iii. Each party’s position on whether a technical tutorial is necessary; and
iv. For any party who proposes to call one or more witnesses at any claim
construction hearing, the identity of each such witness, the subject
matter of his or her testimony, and an estimate of the time required for
the testimony.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
1d4eb7e2df4d8edc80f99905f52609bff409b43924dc6c03129ee20a1244068d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.