US · rules
D. Md. L.R. 705.3
Action Taken by Other Courts
a) Attorney’s Duty to Disclose
Upon being subjected to public discipline, transferred to disability inactive status, or
enjoined from the practice of law by any other court of the United States or the District of
Columbia, or by a court of any state, territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United
States, any attorney admitted to practice before this Court shall promptly inform the Clerk
of such action and provide a copy of the order or document imposing discipline or other
non-disciplinary action affecting licensure within thirty (30) days after the imposition of
discipline or other action.
b) Notification to Attorney
Upon the receipt of a copy of a judgment or order demonstrating that an attorney
admitted to practice before this Court has been disbarred, suspended, publicly reprimanded,
transferred to disability inactive status, or enjoined from the practice of law by another
court, this Court shall forthwith issue a notice directed to the attorney-respondent
containing:
i. a copy of the judgment or order from the other court;
ii. an order immediately suspending the attorney-respondent, in the event the
discipline imposed by the other court consists of suspension or
disbarment, an order transferring the attorney to disability inactive status,
in the event the attorney-respondent has been transferred to disability
inactive status, or an order enjoining the attorney-respondent from the
practice before this Court, in the event the attorney-respondent has been
enjoined from the practice of law; and
iii. an order directing the attorney-respondent to show cause within thirty (30)
days after service of the order why identical action by this Court would be
unwarranted.
c) Stay
In the event the discipline, transfer, or injunction imposed in the other jurisdiction has
been stayed, any reciprocal action imposed by this Court shall be deferred until such stay
expires.
d) Imposition of Identical Discipline or Other Action
This Court shall impose identical discipline or other action to that imposed by the other
court unless the attorney-respondent demonstrates, or this Court finds, upon the face of the
record upon which the discipline, transfer, or injunction in another jurisdiction is predicated,
it clearly appears:
i. the procedure was so lacking in notice or opportunity to be heard as to
constitute a deprivation of due process; or
ii. there was such an infirmity of proof establishing the misconduct as to give
rise to the clear conviction that this Court could not, consistent with its
duty, accept as final the conclusion of the other court on that subject; or
iii. the imposition of the same discipline or other action by this Court would
result in grave injustice; or
iv. the misconduct established is deemed by this Court to warrant substantially
different discipline or injunctive action.
Where this Court determines any of the above elements exist, it shall enter such other
order as it deems appropriate.
e) Treatment of Disciplinary or Other Sanctions in Other Jurisdictions
For the purposes of this subsection, this Court shall treat public censures imposed by
another court as identical to a public reprimand imposed by this Court. This Court shall
treat any injunctive action based on an attorney’s physical or mental condition as identical to
transfer to disability inactive status. This Court shall not impose reciprocal discipline for
another court’s imposition of any level of discipline other than disbarment, suspension, or
public reprimand.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
3d839798f2355f5321f6e4daedfb193bfaeb2ebdcc2255d7178e0d4445357475
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.