Bindinglaw

US · rules

D. Md. L.R. 104.13

Proposed Confidentiality Orders

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

Any proposed confidentiality order shall include (a) a definition of confidentiality

consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); (b) a method for challenging particular designations of

confidentiality with the burden remaining on the party seeking confidentiality to justify it

under Rule 26(c); (c) a provision that whenever materials subject to the confidentiality order

(or any pleading, motion or memorandum referring to them) are proposed to be filed in the

Court record under seal, the party making such filing must simultaneously submit a motion

and accompanying order pursuant to L.R. 105.11; and (d) a provision permitting the Clerk to

return to counsel or destroy any sealed material at the end of the litigation.

Provenance

Source
www.mdd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
304d70172d555fd692018c57a1a640d93d4b9c865d6bdeca47eea6fcc8fcce2d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D. Md. L.R. 104.13 — Proposed Confidentiality Orders · binding.law