US · rules
D. Md. L.R. 104.10
Actions and Witnesses Exempted from Provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P
26(a)(2)(B)
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a party must provide the disclosures required by
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) only as to experts retained or specially employed by a party to
provide expert testimony. The disclosures need not be provided as to hybrid fact/expert
witnesses such as treating physicians. The party must disclose the existence of any hybrid
fact/expert witness pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(A), and disclose the subject matter on
which the witness is expected to present evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 702, 703, or 705, as
well as a summary of the facts and opinions to which the hybrid fact/expert witness is
expected to testify, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C). In addition, an adverse party may
obtain the opinions of such witnesses (to the extent appropriate) through interrogatories,
document production requests, and depositions.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mdd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
5ad5e4bb2136d68504121fc64593032481dcfd787247a8dc67501e7266815f0c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.