US · rules
D. Mass. L.R. 83.5.1
Admission to the District Bar
(a) Eligibility for Admission. An attorney is eligible for admission to the bar of this district
if the attorney:
(1) is a member of the bar in good standing in Massachusetts;
(2) is a member of the bar in good standing in every jurisdiction in which the attorney
has been admitted to practice; and
(3) is not the subject of disciplinary proceedings pending in any jurisdiction in which
the attorney is a member of the bar.
(b) Procedure for Admission.
(1) Application. All applicants for admission to the bar of this district must:
(A) complete, verify, and file an application for admission on an official form provided
by the clerk;
(B) provide a Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Judicial Court of
Massachusetts; and
(C) read and agree to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court
for the District of Massachusetts.
If the applicant has previously had a pro hac vice admission to this court (or other
admission for a limited purpose under L.R. 83.5.3) revoked for misconduct, the
applicant must notify the court of that fact, and describe the circumstances in detail.
(2) Review by Clerk. The clerk shall examine the application and Certificate of Good
Standing to determine whether the application is in order. If the application is in
order, the clerk shall place the name of the applicant on the list for the first available
admission ceremony. If the clerk questions whether the documents satisfy the
requirements, the clerk shall transmit the documents to the United States Attorney
for review.
(3) Review by United States Attorney. The United States Attorney shall make a
recommendation on the application within 21 days after transmittal of the
application. If the United States Attorney recommends that the application should
be granted, he or she shall return the application to the clerk with such
recommendation in writing. The clerk shall place the name of the applicant on the
list for the first available admission ceremony. If the United States Attorney
recommends that the application should not be granted, he or she shall return the
application to the clerk with written objection. The clerk may deny the application
without prejudice and send a notice of the denial to the applicant together with a
copy of the objection from the United States Attorney.
(4) Motion to Approve after Denial. Any applicant denied admission may file a motion
seeking to approve the application. The motion shall be served on the United States
Attorney and presented to the Miscellaneous Business Docket (MBD) judge. The
United States Attorney shall file any objection within 14 days of service. If the
court approves the application, the clerk shall place the name of the applicant on
the list for the first available admission ceremony.
(5) Oath or Affirmation. Approved applicants must make the following oath or
affirmation before a district judge or magistrate judge:
I solemnly swear (or affirm) that I shall conduct myself as a member of
the bar of the United States District Court for the District of
Massachusetts fairly and ethically and in accordance with the
Constitution of the United States, the law of this district, and the local
rules of this court.
(6) Registration and Fee. Approved applicants must also sign the register of attorneys
and pay the approved attorney admission fee to the clerk.
History
Effective September 1, 1990; amended effective December 1, 2009, January 1, 2015.
Provenance
- Source
- www.mad.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
cda5365b040dbdc626080ab76143070f71dc3fdb26626f63b7b06500befe6da1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.