Bindinglaw

US · rules

D. Mass. L.R. 116.6

Declination of Disclosure and Protective Orders

activein force · 2012-02-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Declination. If in the judgment of a party it would be detrimental to the interests of justice

to make any of the disclosures required by these rules, such disclosures may be declined,

before or at the time that disclosure is due, and the opposing party advised in writing, with

a copy filed with the clerk, of the specific matters on which disclosure is declined and the

reasons for declining. If the opposing party seeks to challenge the declination, that party

shall file a motion to compel that states the reasons why disclosure is sought. Upon the

filing of such motion, except to the extent otherwise provided by law, the burden shall be

on the party declining disclosure to demonstrate, by affidavit and supporting memorandum

citing legal authority, why such disclosure should not be made. The declining party may

file its submissions in support of declination under seal pursuant to L.R. 7.2 for the court's

in camera consideration. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, a redacted version of each

such submission shall be served on the moving party, which may reply.

(b) Ex Parte Motions for Protective Orders. This rule does not preclude any party from

moving under L.R. 7.2 and ex parte (that is, without serving the opposing party) for leave

to file an ex parte motion for a protective order with respect to any discovery matter. Nor

does this rule limit the court's power to accept or reject an ex parte motion or to decide such

a motion in any manner it deems appropriate.

History

Adopted September 8, 1998; effective December 1, 1998; amended effective February 1, 2012.

Provenance

Source
www.mad.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
f875930f4fc7f53e7afc4d11c07f43299494ee03dfbb4e1d2d019d30a7bce434
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.