US · rules
W.D. La. LR 41.3
Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute
A civil action may be dismissed by the clerk of court or any judge of this court for lack of prosecution
as follows:
A. Where no service of process has been made within 90 days after filing of the
complaint;
B. Where no responsive pleadings have been filed or default has been entered within
60 days after service of process; or
C. Where a cause has been pending six months without proceedings being taken within
such period. This provision will not apply if the cause is awaiting action by the court.
D. Where an attorney or pro se litigant fails to notify the court in writing of an address
change when notice is returned to the court for the reason of an incorrect address
and no correction is made to the address for a period of 30 days.
Prior to issuance of a dismissal, notice will be sent to the plaintiff, and plaintiff will be allowed 30
calendar days from mailing of the notice within which to file evidence of good cause for plaintiff's
failure to act. If no response is received within the allotted time, the clerk may dismiss the civil
action. If a timely response is filed, a district judge or magistrate judge may order additional time
within which to take action, dismiss the civil action without prejudice or make any other appropriate
order.
Dismissal under this rule is shall be without prejudice. The Order of Dismissal will allow for
reinstatement of the civil action within 30 days for good cause shown.
Provenance
- Source
- www.lawd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
3a6a146208ef9baff8c80f118bd781188ce98d01734ea4b156a95fd1843a803e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.