Bindinglaw

US · rules

D. Kan. Rule 83.8.8

Review of Non-Core Proceedings Heard by Bankruptcy Judge

activein force · 2014-03-17 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Applicability of Bankruptcy Rule 9033. Where the Bankruptcy Court has issued

proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in a particular matter, Bankruptcy

Rule 9033 applies to the review of those findings and conclusions, regardless of

whether the proceeding has been designated core or non-core.

(b) Objections; Designation of Record. If a party objects to the proposed findings of

fact and conclusions of law filed by a bankruptcy judge, the party shall serve and

file along with its objection a designation of the items contained in the Bankruptcy

Court record that the party believes the district judge will need to review the

proposed findings and conclusions as provided by Bankruptcy Rule 9033(d).

Within the time allowed for responding to the objection, any other party shall serve

and file a designation of any additional items in the record that the party believes

the district judge will need. If any party designates a transcript of a proceeding or

any part thereof, the party shall immediately deliver to the reporter (in the event the

matter was recorded by a court reporter) and file with the clerk a written request for

the transcript and make satisfactory arrangements for the payment of its cost.

(c) Transmission to District Court. The Bankruptcy Court clerk shall transmit to the

District Court clerk a copy of the proposed findings and conclusions. On receiving

the proposed findings and conclusions, the District Court clerk will assign the

matter to a district judge.

(d) Specificity Required. The district judge may summarily overrule objections

lacking specificity as to allegedly erroneous findings or conclusions.

(e) Entry of Order. If no objection has been timely filed or if the parties consent in

writing, the district judge may accept the recommendations of the bankruptcy judge

and enter appropriate orders without further notice.

* * *

History

As amended 3/17/14, 6/18/97.

Provenance

Source
www.ksd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
92b219bdbcf0766aebb8a1167ef7a14fdee9a3b5c9a4602754280c0339755420
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D. Kan. Rule 83.8.8 — Review of Non-Core Proceedings… · binding.law