Bindinglaw

US · rules

D. Kan. Rule 39.1

Oral Argument at Jury Trials

activein force · 2023-01-04 – presentact-effective-date

At trial, the party having the burden of proof has the right to open and close the jury

argument regardless of whether the defendant has offered evidence. If each of the parties has the

burden of proof on one or more issues, the court will determine the order of arguments. The court

may set time limitations on arguments.

* * *

As amended 3/04. Formerly Rule 122(a).

Provenance

Source
www.ksd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
2026c120fe93f8e6c8abb933bfa084f1a25c8c37508a488d21f8b845cdcc1802
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D. Kan. Rule 39.1 — Oral Argument at Jury Trials · binding.law