US · rules
S.D. Ind. L.R. 80-2
Redaction of Official Transcripts of Court Proceedings
(a) Redaction of Personal Data Identifiers. Upon the filing of an official transcript of
any court proceeding under S.D. Ind. L.R. 80-1, attorneys of record will review the
transcript and determine whether redaction of personal data identifiers within the
transcript is necessary to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1. The
requirements of this rule apply to pro se litigants.
(1) Review of Transcript. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, attorneys of
record who represent a party or parties in a matter in which an official transcript has
been filed must review the following portions of the official transcript:
(A) opening and closing statements made on the party's behalf;
(B) statements of the party;
(C) the testimony of any witnesses called by the party;
(D) sentencing proceedings; and
(E) any other portion of the transcript as ordered by the court.
An attorney serving as "standby" counsel appointed to be available to assist a pro
se defendant in his or her defense in a criminal case must review the same portions
of the transcript as if the pro se defendant were his or her client. If the transcript
relates to a panel attorney representation pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (CJA),
including serving as standby counsel, the attorney conducting the review is entitled
to compensation under the CJA for functions reasonably performed to fulfill the
redaction obligation and for reimbursement for related reasonable expenses.
(2) Notice of Intent to Request Redaction. If any portion of an official transcript is
subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1, the attorneys of
record will either jointly or individually file a “Notice of Intent to Request Redaction”
within 7 days from the date on which the official transcript was filed. If a Notice of
Intent to Redact is not filed within the allotted 7 days, the court will assume redaction of
personal data identifiers from the transcript is not necessary.
(3) Redaction Statement. If redaction of personal data identifiers within an official
transcript is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1, attorneys of record
will either jointly or individually file a “Redaction Statement” within 21 days from the
date on which the official transcript was filed. The Redaction Statement will certify that
the official transcript has been reviewed by counsel and identify the following
information:
(A) the filed date and document number of the official transcript for which
redaction is requested;
(B) a description of each type of personal data identifier to be redacted (e.g.,
social-security number);
(C) transcript page number(s) and line number(s) identifying the location of
each personal data identifier to be redacted; and
(D) the redacted version of each such personal data identifier (e.g., social-security number to read as XXX-XX-1234).
The Redaction Statement must not disclose, in its unredacted form, any personal data
identifier.
(b) Redaction of Information other than Personal Data Identifiers. Any party may
request redaction of information other than the personal data identifiers set forth in Fed. R.
Civ. P. 5.2 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 by filing a “Motion to Redact Transcript.” Such
motion must state the grounds for requesting redaction, set forth the information to be
redacted in the format required by (a)(3), and be filed within 21 days from the date on
which the official transcript was filed.
(c) Filing Redacted Transcripts. After the filing of a Redaction Statement or court
order granting a party's Motion to Redact Transcript, the court reporter will prepare and
file a redacted version of the official transcript within 31 days from the date on which the
official transcript was filed.
Provenance
- Source
- www.insd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
2e689e1c9e444734077df21b99345943a3dffaf52d11a93b6079da8e78e0d558
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.