Bindinglaw

US · rules

S.D. Ind. L.R. 6-1

Extensions of Time

activein force · 2023-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Automatic Initial Extension. The court requires all initial extensions of the

following deadlines to be accomplished by a Notice of Parties' First Extension of

Time (without a proposed order), rather than by motion, unless a party affirmatively

objects to extending the deadline or subsection (b) of this rule applies:

• the deadline for filing a response to a pleading as defined by Fed. R. Civ.

P. 7(a); and

• the deadline for responding to any written request for discovery or

admissions.

No initial extension of these deadlines may exceed 28 days. The party to whom the

deadline applies must file a Notice of Parties' First Extension of Time that:

(1) confirms that the deadline has not been previously extended;

(2) sets forth the original deadline and the new deadline and confirms that

the extension is for 28 or fewer days;

(3) confirms that the extension does not interfere with the Case

Management Plan, scheduled hearings or trials, or other deadlines set by court

order; and

(4) as to each other party who has appeared in the case, state either that (1)

the party’s counsel has agreed to the extension; or (2) the filing attorney

attempted to reach the party’s counsel (or the party if pro se) but was unable to

do so, providing the dates, times and manner of all attempts to reach opposing

counsel.

(b) Pro Se Parties. Filing of a Notice of Parties' First Extension of Time

pursuant to subsection (a) of this rule is optional in any case in which there is a pro

se party who is not in default. A party opting not to file a Notice of Parties' First

Extension of Time must file a motion for any extension of a deadline in such cases.

(c) Motion Required. Unless subsection (a) of this rule applies, a request for an

extension of time not made in open court or at a conference must:

(1) be made by written motion;

(2) state the original deadline and the requested deadline;

(3) state the reasons for the requested extension and explain why those

reasons constitute good cause (or excusable neglect if the motion is made after

the deadline has expired) as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b);

and

(4) if all parties are represented by counsel, either:

(A) state that there is no objection to the extension; or

(B) describe all attempts made to obtain an agreement to the extension

and state whether opposing counsel objects to it.

History

Note: Amended July 1, 2023, to clarify that initial extensions of 28 days or less must be made by Notice, not Motion.

Provenance

Source
www.insd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
0cf9cbbb0f6f5978221ef90e1b8844d813d373d8b5bbfb0798087b4e6875b4c9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.