Bindinglaw

US · rules

S.D. Ind. L.R. 30-1

Conduct of Depositions

activein force · 2026-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Questions About an Asserted Privilege. An attorney may question a

deponent who refuses to answer a question on the basis of privilege about

information related to the appropriateness of the privilege, including whether:

(1) the privilege applies under the circumstances;

(2) the privilege has been waived; and

(3) circumstances exist to overcome a claim of qualified privilege.

(b) Private Conference Regarding a Pending Question. A deponent's attorney

may not initiate a private conference with the deponent during the deposition about

a pending question except to determine whether to assert a claim of privilege.

(c) Raising Objections with the Court. A party may recess a deposition to

submit an objection by phone to a judicial officer if the objection:

(1) could cause the deposition to be terminated; and

(2) can be resolved without submitting written materials to the court.

(d) Scheduling Depositions. Under the Standards for Professional Conduct

within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, Lawyers Duty to Other Counsel,

paragraph 14, attorneys will make a good faith effort to schedule depositions in a

manner that avoids scheduling conflicts. Unless agreed by counsel or otherwise

ordered by the court, no deposition will be scheduled on less than 14 days notice.

Provenance

Source
www.insd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
e4f54ada722ddd3541dd0004debfb6dabc8291b7fc78af4d5feae6c7a6643bbd
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.