Bindinglaw

US · rules

N.D. Ind. L.R. 26-1

Form of Certain Discovery Documents

activein force · 2013-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Form of Requests. A party propounding written discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P.

33, 34, or 36 must number each interrogatory or request sequentially.

(b) Form of Responses. A party responding (by answer or objection) to written

discovery must:

(1) fully quote each interrogatory or request immediately before the party’s

response; and

(2) number each response to correspond with the interrogatory or request

being responded to.

(c) Limit on Requests for Admission. Ordinarily, a party may not serve more than

30 requests for admission on another party (not counting requests that relate to

the authenticity of a document). A party wanting to serve more requests must

file a motion setting forth the proposed additional requests and why they are

necessary.

Provenance

Source
www.innd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
1e2884b53ce6717785cc7fd2cbbf2f2ba48a2deb9d378ed20a64f5f17c50dce9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.