US · rules
N.D. Ind. L.R. 16-3
Continuances
(a) Court’s Discretion. The court may continue proceedings in a civil case on its
own or on the motion of one or more parties.
(b) Consultation with Clients. Attorneys must consult with their clients before
asking the court to continue a trial.
(c) Unavailable Evidence. A party seeking to continue a trial because evidence is
unavailable must include with the motion an affidavit showing:
(1) that the evidence is material;
(2) that the party has acted diligently to obtain it;
(3) where the evidence might be; and
(4) if the evidence is the testimony of an absent witness:
(A) the name and residence of the witness, if known;
(B) the likelihood of procuring the testimony within a reasonable time;
(C) that neither the party nor anyone at the party’s request or with the
party’s knowledge procured the witness’s absence;
(D) the facts the party believes the witness will truthfully testify to; and
(E) that the party cannot prove the facts by another witness whose
testimony can be readily procured.
(d) Stipulation to Unavailable Evidence. The court may not continue a trial
because evidence is unavailable if all parties stipulate to the content of the
unavailable evidence. Despite the stipulation, the parties may contest the
stipulated evidence as if it had been available at trial.
(e) Award of Costs. The court may order a party seeking a continuance to
reimburse other parties for their actual expenses caused by the delay.
Provenance
- Source
- www.innd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
0572cda1305633384e1dc4c56a5e68ce3794919ae1571d8ca19ef0bd9680f06e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.