US · rules
C.D. Ill. Civil LR 16.2
Scheduling Conference and Order
(A) Cases Covered
The Court shall hold a scheduling conference as soon as practicable, but unless the
judge finds good cause for the delay, within the earlier of 90 days after any
defendant has been served with the complaint or 60 days after any defendant has
appeared in all civil cases pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure to establish a scheduling order to govern case management except:
(1) Claims for relief within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction as set forth
in Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Supplemental
Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims;
(2) Social Security cases filed under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g);
(3) Applications for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254;
(4) Applications for review of sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255;
(5) Petitions brought by the United States to enforce a summons of the Internal
Revenue Service;
(6) Appeals from rulings of a bankruptcy judge;
(7) Appeals from judgments of a United States magistrate judge;
(8) Naturalization proceedings filed as civil cases or proceedings to cancel or
revoke citizenship;
(9) Requests for temporary restraining orders;
(10) Proceedings in bankruptcy;
(11) Proceedings to compel the giving of testimony or production of documents
under a subpoena or summons issued by an officer; agency, or
instrumentality of the United States not authorized to compel compliance;
(12) Proceedings to compel the giving of testimony or production of documents
in this district in connection with discovery, or for perpetuation of
testimony, for use in a matter pending or contemplated in a district court of
another district;
(13) Proceedings for the temporary enforcement of orders of the National Labor
Relations Board;
(14) Actions to enforce out-of-state judgments;
(15) Cases in which no service upon defendant(s) has been effected within 120
days of filing of the complaint;
(16) Other cases in which the Court’s review of the file indicates that the burden
of a scheduling conference would exceed the administrative efficiency to be
gained;
(17) The presiding judge may order a scheduling conference in any case.
(B) Order
At the conclusion of the scheduling conference, the presiding judge will enter an
order setting forth the time limits as established at the conference. A copy of the
order will be provided by the Clerk of this Court to each of the parties or their
counsel.
(C) Scheduling by Telephone Conference
The scheduling conference may be held by a telephone conference call or the Court
may require personal appearance. Lead counsel must participate in the scheduling
conference or inform the Clerk of the Court of substitute counsel before the time
set for the conference. Whoever participates on behalf of a party is expected to be
prepared to address the matters contemplated by the scheduling order and have full
authority to bind the party as to such matters.
(D) Dates
The parties and their counsel are bound by the dates specified in the scheduling
order absent a finding of due diligence and good cause for changing said dates.
(E) Scheduling Order
The scheduling order will contain certain deadlines for the following:
(1) Amendment of pleadings;
(2) Joinder of additional parties;
(3) Disclosure of expert witnesses;
(4) Completion of discovery;
(5) Filing of dispositive motions.
Revised 04/2016
Provenance
- Source
- www.ilcd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
3094b147a8de9856694e7b8d7448d15253d795fce7bad0fb58c328d113c4cfff
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.