Bindinglaw

US · rules

S.D. Iowa LR 16

Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan

activein force · 2020-12-07 – presentact-effective-date

a. Timing of Proposed Order and Plan. Within 90 days after the filing of the complaint or 60

days after the filing of a notice of removal (see LR 81(b)), all attorneys of record and all

unrepresented parties must submit for approval by a magistrate judge a proposed Rule 16(b)

and 26(f) scheduling order and discovery plan.

The parties must confer to complete the proposed scheduling order and discovery plan as soon

as practicable, but at least 14 days before the proposed scheduling order and discovery plan is

due.

b. Completion of Proposed Order and Plan. The attorneys of record and all unrepresented

parties who have appeared in the case are jointly responsible for preparing a proposed

scheduling order and discovery plan. The proposed scheduling order and discovery plan must

be prepared using the form supplied by the Clerk of Court, and must contain all of the

information requested in the form. The form may be downloaded from the courts’ websites.

The completed form must be filed.

c. Dismissal for Failure to Submit Timely Proposed Order and Plan. The failure to submit

timely a proposed scheduling order and discovery plan may result in dismissal of the case.

d. Cases Not Subject to Requirement. A proposed scheduling order and discovery plan must

be submitted in all civil cases, except for the following:

1. An action for judicial review based on an administrative record, such as a Social Security

benefits case or a claim-review case brought under the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974;

2. A petition, application, or motion for habeas corpus, or other proceeding to challenge a

criminal conviction or sentence;

3. An action brought without counsel by a person in custody of the United States, a state, or

a state subdivision;

4. An action to enforce or quash an administrative summons or subpoena;

5. An action by the United States to recover benefit payments;

6. An action by the United States to collect on a student loan guaranteed by the United States;

7. A proceeding ancillary to proceedings in other courts;

8. An action to enforce an arbitration award;

9. A foreclosure or civil forfeiture action filed by the United States;

10. An IRS summons enforcement action; and

11. Any other class of cases so designated by order of the court.

e. Scheduling Conference. After reviewing the proposed scheduling order and discovery plan,

the magistrate judge may issue the Rule 16(b) and 26(f) scheduling order and discovery plan,

either as submitted or with revisions, or may set a scheduling conference. Nothing in this rule

precludes the parties from requesting a scheduling or planning conference with the magistrate

judge at any time.

f. Requests for Extensions of Scheduling Order Deadlines. A motion to extend a scheduling

order deadline must demonstrate good cause for the requested extension and also must contain

the following:

1. A description of the discovery not completed;

2. A description of the discovery that has been completed;

3. An explanation of why all discovery cannot be completed by the existing deadline;

4. A statement of when discovery will be completed; and

5. The current trial date and a statement of whether the moving party believes the requested

extension will affect any scheduled trial date.

g. Dispositive Motion Deadline. The deadline in the proposed scheduling order and discovery

plan for filing dispositive motions must be at least 150 days before the proposed ready-for-trial

date. Any request to extend a dispositive motion deadline must ensure 150 days remain

between the new dispositive motion deadline and the scheduled trial date.

h. Deadlines in Actions for Judicial Review Based on Administrative Record. In actions for

judicial review based on an administrative record, such as claim-review cases brought under

the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, within 90 days after the filing of the

complaint, all attorneys of record and all unrepresented parties must confer and submit to the

Clerk of Court for approval by a magistrate judge a proposed scheduling order setting forth

deadlines for the filing of the administrative record and briefs. This section does not apply to

Social Security benefits cases, which are scheduled by the court.

i. Sanctions. The failure to comply with a deadline established in the Rule 16(b) and 26(f)

scheduling order and discovery plan may result in sanctions, including the exclusion of

evidence, the prevention of witnesses from testifying, the striking of pleadings or other

documents, the denial of oral argument, and the imposition of attorney fees and costs.

Provenance

Source
www.iasd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
360ba1497fe2fcf0c31d34b2e91b0c68254eba1d12fe72a03094d752dd973d6e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
S.D. Iowa LR 16 — Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan · binding.law