US · rules
D. Guam GNLR 22.5
Disbarment on Consent While Under Disciplinary Investigation or
Prosecution.
(a) Any attorney admitted to practice before this Court who is the subject of an investigation into, or a
pending proceeding involving, allegations of misconduct, may consent to disbarment, but only by
delivering to this Court an affidavit stating that the attorney desires to consent to disbarment and that:
(1) the attorney's consent is freely and voluntarily rendered; the attorney is not being subjected
to coercion or duress; and the attorney is fully aware of the implications of so consenting;
(2) the attorney is aware that there is a presently pending investigation or proceeding involving
allegations that there exist grounds for the attorney's discipline, the nature of which the
attorney shall specifically set forth;
(3) the attorney acknowledges that the material facts so alleged are true; and
(4) the attorney so consents because the attorney knows that if charges were predicated upon
the matters under investigation, or if the proceeding were prosecuted, the attorney could not
successfully defend himself.
(b) Upon receipt of the required affidavit, this Court shall enter an order disbarring the attorney.
(c) The order disbarring the attorney on consent shall be a matter of public record. However, the
affidavit required under the provisions of this Rule shall not be publicly disclosed or made available for
use in any other proceeding except upon order of this Court.
Provenance
- Source
- www.gud.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
46b6f66ff7e4468fb1b824e5e8040f117cb32175c02c67c9f79f64e9bbe0be2f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.