N.D. Ga. LR 16.7

(A) Purpose. The Court adopts this Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR")

Program to provide alternative processes for the resolution of civil disputes with

resultant savings in time and costs to litigants and to the Court, but without sacrificing

the quality of justice or the right of the litigants to a full trial in the event of an impasse

following ADR. The program and the procedures established thereunder are intended

to comply fully with the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998. 28 U.S.C. § 651

et. seq.

(B) Description of ADR Program. At various stages in the litigation of a civil

case, litigants and their counsel are required to consider whether utilization of an

alternative dispute resolution process is desirable or appropriate in their particular case.

See LR 16.7(D), below. A judge may authorize use of an ADR process that is

facilitated by individuals or programs not connected with the Court or, alternatively,

the judge may authorize utilization of an ADR process offered through the Court’s

court-annexed ADR program.

(1) General Referrals. A judge may in his or her discretion refer any civil

case to a non-binding ADR process, e.g. early neutral evaluation, mediation, or non-binding arbitration. Upon the consent of the parties, the judge may refer any civil case

to binding arbitration, binding summary jury trial or bench trial, or other binding ADR

process.

The timing of the referral to a binding or non-binding ADR process under this

section is within the discretion of the referring judge.

(2) Court-annexed ADR Program. Note: This program has not been

funded by Congress and will not be implemented until funded.

(3) Compromise Negotiations. Every ADR process conducted in a civil

case filed in this Court will be treated as a compromise negotiation for purposes of the

Federal Rules of Evidence and the Georgia Rules of Evidence. No record will be made

of the ADR proceedings. The ADR neutral in the particular case is disqualified from

appearing as a witness, consultant, attorney, or expert in any pending or future action

relating to that dispute.

(4) Stay of Proceedings. In the initial Order directing the litigants to an

ADR process or to the court-annexed ADR program, the judge will have indicated

whether the proceedings will or will not be stayed during the ADR process.

(C) Definitions.

As used in this local rule:

(1) Mediation is a non-binding supervised process presided over by a

qualified and neutral mediator.

(2) Early neutral evaluation (“ENE”) is a non-binding supervised process

where a neutral evaluator provides the litigants with an evaluation of the strengths and

weaknesses of each party’s case to the extent possible at an early stage, helps the

parties focus on the issues, organizes an efficient discovery plan, identifies a plan for

expeditious resolution of the case by dispositive motion or trial, and/or, if possible,

settles all or part of the issues in the case.

(3) Arbitration is the submission of a dispute to a neutral third party or

panel, which then renders a decision. Arbitration is an adjudicative process that

requires each side to offer evidence and present argument, upon which the neutral or

panel then decides the case.

(D) Requirement to Consider ADR.

(1) Counsel for the litigants are required to discuss utilization of an ADR

process at the Early Planning Conference (see LR 16.1). If counsel wish to participate

in ADR, counsel shall immediately so notify the judge to whom the case is assigned in

writing, specifying which ADR process is desired and whether they desire to

participate in the court-annexed ADR plan or otherwise. If counsel decide against

participation in an ADR process at this time, this decision must be reported in the

Preliminary Planning Report (see LR 16.2).

(2) For cases not resolved sooner, counsel shall again consider participation

in ADR at the required Conference After Discovery (see LR 16.3). The assigned

judge must be notified immediately if counsel wish to participate in an ADR process.

(3) In any case in which all counsel do not support participation in ADR,

individual counsel may provide the judge confidential notice, in writing, of that

counsel’s desire for ADR. The judge will then make a determination as to whether the

case should be included in the ADR program.

(E) Notification of Referral. The judge will notify the parties in writing when the

judge has referred a case to an ADR process, specifying whether the referral is to the

court-annexed program or otherwise.

(F) Selection of ADR Neutral.

(1) General Referrals. For ADR processes conducted by others, the judge

will appoint the ADR neutral. However, before making the appointment, the judge

may direct that each party send the judge a list of the names of three (3) ADR neutrals

after which the judge will then select the ADR neutral. If the parties have mutually

agreed on one of the ADR neutrals listed in their submissions, the parties may so

notify the judge, who in his or her discretion, may consider their recommendations.

The judge will provide the parties written notice of the identity of the ADR neutral

selected and will send a copy of the appointment to the ADR neutral.

(2) Referrals to Court-Annexed Program. In cases referred to the court-annexed program, the ADR administrator shall appoint the neutral after providing

counsel with the names of three (3) or more proposed neutrals and considering any

objections counsel may have to the proposed neutrals.

(3) Judicial Contact. Once a neutral has been appointed, counsel are not

allowed to have any oral or written communication regarding the ADR process with

the judge to whom the case is assigned.

(4) ADR Conferences. Once appointed, the ADR neutral will arrange for a

conference at a time within thirty (30) days from the date of the notice naming the

ADR neutral, unless otherwise ordered by the judge.

(G) Disqualification of ADR Neutrals. Any person selected as an ADR neutral

may be disqualified for bias or prejudice as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 144 and shall be

disqualified in any case in which such action would be required by a justice, judge, or

magistrate judge governed by 28 U.S.C. § 455.

(H) Required Submissions Before ADR Conferences.

At least seven (7) days before the ADR conference, the parties must submit to

the ADR neutral:

(a) copies of relevant pleadings and motions;

(b) a short memorandum which identifies the persons, in addition to

counsel, who will attend the ADR conference and identifies the individuals

connected to the opposing litigant whose presence would be helpful to a

productive session. The ADR neutral shall determine whether any person so

identified should be requested to attend;

(c) a written statement, not to exceed ten (10) pages double spaced,

which summarizes the legal and factual position of each party respecting the

issues in dispute. For ENE conferences, each party also shall prepare a written

evaluation statement; any written evaluation statements for an ENE conference

shall not be submitted to the judge;

(d) such other relevant materials as the ADR neutral requests.

At the conference, counsel shall be prepared to respond fully and candidly in a

private caucus to questions by the ADR neutral regarding the estimated costs to

counsel’s clients of any remaining discovery and of litigating the case through trial,

including attorneys' fees and expert witnesses, and regarding the claimed damages,

including the method of computation.

(I) Procedure Applicable to all ADR Conferences.

(1) Attendance. The attorney primarily responsible for each litigant’s case

must personally attend the ADR conference and must be prepared and authorized to

discuss all relevant issues, including settlement unless excused by the neutral. The

litigants must also be present unless excused by Court order. When a litigant is other

than an individual, an authorized representative of such litigant, with full authority to

settle, must attend. When a litigant has insurance coverage for the claims in dispute, an

authorized representative of the insurance company, with full authority to settle, must

attend. Willful failure of a party to attend an ADR conference will be reported to the

administrator by the ADR neutral, who will then report the absence to a judicial

officer for possible imposition of sanctions.

ADR conferences will be private. Persons other than the litigants and their

representatives may attend only with the permission of all litigants and with the

consent of the ADR neutral.

(2) Time and Place. The ADR neutral will fix the date and length of each

ADR conference. The conference will be held at a location agreeable to the ADR

neutral and the litigants or as otherwise directed by the judge.

(3) Informal Procedure. The ADR conference, and such additional

conferences as the ADR neutral deems appropriate, will be informal.

(4) Private Caucuses; Confidentiality. The ADR neutral may hold

separate, private caucuses with any litigant or counsel. The ADR neutral must not

disclose to any other party any information disclosed by a litigant during a caucus

which that party indicates to the ADR neutral should be treated as confidential. It will

be the responsibility of each party to clearly indicate to the ADR neutral which

information is and is not deemed confidential by that litigant.

(5) Statements; Confidentiality. The ADR neutral shall have the litigants

and their attorneys sign a form agreeing that any statements made or presented during

the ADR conference are confidential and may not be used as evidence in any

subsequent administrative or judicial proceeding. The only exception shall be if the

judge requests a report from the EN evaluator in the judge's order appointing the EN

evaluator.

(J) Procedure at Mediation Conference.

(1) Procedure. The mediator will conduct the process in order to assist the

litigants in arriving at a settlement of all or some of the issues involved in the case.

The mediator will determine how to structure the mediation conference.

(2) Settlement Proposal by Mediator. If after reasonable efforts the

litigants fail to develop settlement terms or upon request of the litigants, the mediator

may submit to the litigants a final settlement proposal that the mediator believes to be

fair. The litigants carefully will consider such proposal and, at the request of the

mediator, will discuss the proposal with the mediator. The mediator may comment on

questions of law at any appropriate time.

(3) Conclusion of the Mediation Process. The mediator will conclude the

process when:

(a) a settlement is reached by the litigants; or

(b) the mediator concludes, and informs the litigants, that further

efforts would not be useful.

(K) Procedure at ENE Conference.

(1) Procedure. The evaluator will conduct the process in order to help the

parties focus the issues and work efficiently and expeditiously to make the case ready

for trial or settlement. The evaluator will determine how to structure the evaluation

conference.

(2) Scope. At the initial conference, and at any additional conferences the

evaluator deems appropriate, the evaluator may:

(a) permit each litigant to make a brief oral presentation of its position

through counsel or otherwise;

(b) help the litigants to identify areas of agreement and, if feasible,

enter stipulations;

(c) determine whether the litigants wish to negotiate, with or without

the evaluator's assistance, before evaluation of the case;

(d) help the litigants identify issues and assess the relative strengths

and weaknesses of the litigants’ positions;

(e) help the litigants to agree on a plan for exchanging information

and conducting discovery which will enable them to prepare expeditiously for

the resolution of the case by trial, settlement, or dispositive motion;

(f) help the litigants to assess litigation costs realistically;

(g) determine whether one or more additional conferences would

assist in the settlement or case development process and, if so, schedule the

conference and direct the litigants to prepare and submit any additional written

materials needed for the conference;

(h) at the final conference (which may be the initial conference), give

an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of each litigant’s case and of the

probable outcome if the case is tried, including, if feasible, the dollar value of

each claim and counterclaim;

(i) advise the litigants, if appropriate, about the availability of ADR

processes that might assist in resolving the dispute;

(j) act as a mediator or otherwise assist in settlement negotiations

either before or after presenting the evaluation called for in Section (2)(h)

above; and

(k) assist the litigants in narrowing the issues in the case, and, if

requested by the judge, the evaluator may send a report to the judge on whether

a preliminary pretrial conference should be held with the judge under Rule 16

to further narrow the issues in the case.

(L) Report to the Court. Within seven (7) days following any ADR process, the

ADR neutral will file a Report indicating the date and length of the ADR process and

whether all required litigants were present. If a settlement agreement is reached, the

Report will indicate that a settlement is reached and the date by which the final

settlement agreement will be executed and the dismissal filed. If no settlement

agreement is reached, the ADR neutral will report in writing that the ADR process was

held, that no agreements were reached, and the recommendations, if any, of the ADR

neutral as to the future processing of the case. The written Report shall be prepared by

the ADR neutral (or at the ADR neutral's request, one of the litigants), shall be signed

by the litigants, and shall be delivered to the ADR administrator.

If a settlement is reached, the ADR neutral, or one of the litigants at the ADR

neutral's request, shall prepare a written document reflecting briefly the terms of the

settlement agreement which shall be signed by the litigants and retained by the ADR

neutral and the litigants.

(M) Fee.

(1) General. Litigants are encouraged to agree upon compensation of the

ADR neutral at or before the first conference. Relevant factors to be considered in

determining an appropriate fee include the complexity of the litigation, the degree of

skill necessary to facilitate the dispute, and the ability of the litigants to pay.

(2) Court Annexed Program. Neutrals in the court-annexed ADR program

are required to list their fee schedules as part of their applications. The Court will

review fee schedules for reasonableness. Daily rather than hourly rates are encouraged.

Any issues with regard to fees will be resolved by the ADR administrator.

(3) Before being placed on the roster for the Court’s annexed ADR program,

a neutral must agree to provide pro bono hours and hours at reduced rates to defray

ADR costs for parties with limited ability to pay. The number of hours required will

be determined by the judges.