US · rules
Fed. R. Evid. 901
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence
(a) IN GENERAL. To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or
identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.
(b) EXAMPLES. The following are examples only—not a complete
list—of evidence that satisfies the requirement:
(1) Testimony of a Witness with Knowledge. Testimony that an
item is what it is claimed to be.
(2) Nonexpert Opinion About Handwriting. A nonexpert’s opinion that handwriting is genuine, based on a familiarity with it
that was not acquired for the current litigation.
(3) Comparison by an Expert Witness or the Trier of Fact. A
comparison with an authenticated specimen by an expert witness or the trier of fact.
(4) Distinctive Characteristics and the Like. The appearance,
contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive
characteristics of the item, taken together with all the circumstances.
(5) Opinion About a Voice. An opinion identifying a person’s
voice—whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording—based on hearing the voice
at any time under circumstances that connect it with the alleged speaker.
(6) Evidence About a Telephone Conversation. For a telephone
conversation, evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time to:
(A) a particular person, if circumstances, including self-identification, show that the person answering was the one
called; or
(B) a particular business, if the call was made to a business and the call related to business reasonably transacted
over the telephone.
(7) Evidence About Public Records. Evidence that:
(A) a document was recorded or filed in a public office as
authorized by law; or
(B) a purported public record or statement is from the
office where items of this kind are kept.
(8) Evidence About Ancient Documents or Data Compilations.
For a document or data compilation, evidence that it:
(A) is in a condition that creates no suspicion about its
authenticity;
(B) was in a place where, if authentic, it would likely be;
and
(C) is at least 20 years old when offered.
(9) Evidence About a Process or System. Evidence describing a
process or system and showing that it produces an accurate result.
(10) Methods Provided by a Statute or Rule. Any method of authentication or identification allowed by a federal statute or
a rule prescribed by the Supreme Court.
(As amended Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)
25 Rule 902 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
589a6846c1e6ae836d06761bf7e9adbc5211a8c9c88eb7d8870edc1fcaebe00d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.