Bindinglaw

US · rules

Fed. R. Crim. P. 59

Matters Before a Magistrate Judge

activein force · 2024-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Nondispositive Matters. A district judge may refer to a magistrate judge for determination any matter that does not dispose

of a charge or defense. The magistrate judge must promptly conduct the required proceedings and, when appropriate, enter on the

record an oral or written order stating the determination. A party

may serve and file objections to the order within 14 days after

being served with a copy of a written order or after the oral order

is stated on the record, or at some other time the court sets. The

district judge must consider timely objections and modify or set

aside any part of the order that is contrary to law or clearly erroneous. Failure to object in accordance with this rule waives a party’s right to review.

(b) Dispositive Matters.

(1) Referral to Magistrate Judge. A district judge may refer

to a magistrate judge for recommendation a defendant’s motion to dismiss or quash an indictment or information, a motion to suppress evidence, or any matter that may dispose of

73 Rule 60 FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

1 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e) was redesignated 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2) by Pub. L. 114–22, title I, § 113(a)(3)(A),

May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 240.

a charge or defense. The magistrate judge must promptly conduct the required proceedings. A record must be made of any

evidentiary proceeding and of any other proceeding if the magistrate judge considers it necessary. The magistrate judge

must enter on the record a recommendation for disposing of

the matter, including any proposed findings of fact. The clerk

must immediately serve copies on all parties.

(2) Objections to Findings and Recommendations. Within 14

days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, or at some other time the court sets, a party may

serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. Unless the district judge directs

otherwise, the objecting party must promptly arrange for

transcribing the record, or whatever portions of it the parties

agree to or the magistrate judge considers sufficient. Failure

to object in accordance with this rule waives a party’s right

to review.

(3) De Novo Review of Recommendations. The district judge

must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. The district judge may accept, reject, or

modify the recommendation, receive further evidence, or re-submit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.

(As added Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec. 1, 2005; amended Mar. 26, 2009, eff.

Dec. 1, 2009.)

Provenance

Source
uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-19
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
a1a13b3ee414611ca22f136b107afa1894ec6f1daa67f77404506dd9a1fdeabc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.