US · rules
Fed. R. Crim. P. 59
Matters Before a Magistrate Judge
(a) Nondispositive Matters. A district judge may refer to a magistrate judge for determination any matter that does not dispose
of a charge or defense. The magistrate judge must promptly conduct the required proceedings and, when appropriate, enter on the
record an oral or written order stating the determination. A party
may serve and file objections to the order within 14 days after
being served with a copy of a written order or after the oral order
is stated on the record, or at some other time the court sets. The
district judge must consider timely objections and modify or set
aside any part of the order that is contrary to law or clearly erroneous. Failure to object in accordance with this rule waives a party’s right to review.
(b) Dispositive Matters.
(1) Referral to Magistrate Judge. A district judge may refer
to a magistrate judge for recommendation a defendant’s motion to dismiss or quash an indictment or information, a motion to suppress evidence, or any matter that may dispose of
73 Rule 60 FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
1 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e) was redesignated 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2) by Pub. L. 114–22, title I, § 113(a)(3)(A),
May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 240.
a charge or defense. The magistrate judge must promptly conduct the required proceedings. A record must be made of any
evidentiary proceeding and of any other proceeding if the magistrate judge considers it necessary. The magistrate judge
must enter on the record a recommendation for disposing of
the matter, including any proposed findings of fact. The clerk
must immediately serve copies on all parties.
(2) Objections to Findings and Recommendations. Within 14
days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, or at some other time the court sets, a party may
serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. Unless the district judge directs
otherwise, the objecting party must promptly arrange for
transcribing the record, or whatever portions of it the parties
agree to or the magistrate judge considers sufficient. Failure
to object in accordance with this rule waives a party’s right
to review.
(3) De Novo Review of Recommendations. The district judge
must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge’s
recommendation. The district judge may accept, reject, or
modify the recommendation, receive further evidence, or re-submit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.
(As added Apr. 25, 2005, eff. Dec. 1, 2005; amended Mar. 26, 2009, eff.
Dec. 1, 2009.)
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
a1a13b3ee414611ca22f136b107afa1894ec6f1daa67f77404506dd9a1fdeabc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.