US · rules
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60
Relief from a Judgment or Order
(a) CORRECTIONS BASED ON CLERICAL MISTAKES; OVERSIGHTS AND
OMISSIONS. The court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake
arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a
judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may do so
on motion or on its own, with or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court and while it is pending, such a mistake may be corrected only with the appellate
court’s leave.
(b) G ROUNDS FOR RELIEF FROM A FINAL JUDGMENT, O RDER, OR
PROCEEDING. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a
party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or
proceeding for the following reasons:
(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a
new trial under Rule 59(b);
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic),
misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;
(4) the judgment is void;
(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged;
it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or
vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or
(6) any other reason that justifies relief.
(c) TIMING AND EFFECT OF THE MOTION.
(1) Timing. A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within
a reasonable time—and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more
than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or the
date of the proceeding.
(2) Effect on Finality. The motion does not affect the judgment’s finality or suspend its operation.
(d) OTHER POWERS TO GRANT RELIEF. This rule does not limit a
court’s power to:
(1) entertain an independent action to relieve a party from
a judgment, order, or proceeding;
85 Rule 62 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
(2) grant relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1655 to a defendant who was
not personally notified of the action; or
(3) set aside a judgment for fraud on the court.
(e) B ILLS AND WRITS ABOLISHED. The following are abolished:
bills of review, bills in the nature of bills of review, and writs of
coram nobis, coram vobis, and audita querela.
(As amended Dec. 27, 1946, eff. Mar. 19, 1948; Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct.
20, 1949; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Aug. 1, 1987; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007.)
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
9c4cf6de67156bd2fb81f93d384cee92a6c3b1e08e152abc4844daa63fdc0e9b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.