US · rules
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2
Privacy Protection For Filings Made with the Court
(a) REDACTED FILINGS. Unless the court orders otherwise, in an
electronic or paper filing with the court that contains an individual’s social-security number, taxpayer-identification number, or
birth date, the name of an individual known to be a minor, or a
financial-account number, a party or nonparty making the filing
may include only:
(1) the last four digits of the social-security number and taxpayer-identification number;
(2) the year of the individual’s birth;
(3) the minor’s initials; and
(4) the last four digits of the financial-account number.
(b) E XEMPTIONS FROM THE REDACTION REQUIREMENT. The redaction requirement does not apply to the following:
(1) a financial-account number that identifies the property
allegedly subject to forfeiture in a forfeiture proceeding;
(2) the record of an administrative or agency proceeding;
(3) the official record of a state-court proceeding;
(4) the record of a court or tribunal, if that record was not
subject to the redaction requirement when originally filed;
(5) a filing covered by Rule 5.2(c) or (d); and
12 Rule 6 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
(6) a pro se filing in an action brought under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241,
2254, or 2255.
(c) LIMITATIONS ON REMOTE ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC FILES; SOCIAL-SECURITY APPEALS AND IMMIGRATION CASES. Unless the court orders otherwise, in an action for benefits under the Social Security
Act, and in an action or proceeding relating to an order of removal, to relief from removal, or to immigration benefits or detention, access to an electronic file is authorized as follows:
(1) the parties and their attorneys may have remote electronic access to any part of the case file, including the administrative record;
(2) any other person may have electronic access to the full
record at the courthouse, but may have remote electronic access only to:
(A) the docket maintained by the court; and
(B) an opinion, order, judgment, or other disposition of
the court, but not any other part of the case file or the administrative record.
(d) FILINGS MADE UNDER SEAL. The court may order that a filing
be made under seal without redaction. The court may later unseal
the filing or order the person who made the filing to file a redacted version for the public record.
(e) PROTECTIVE ORDERS. For good cause, the court may by order
in a case:
(1) require redaction of additional information; or
(2) limit or prohibit a nonparty’s remote electronic access to
a document filed with the court.
(f) O PTION FOR ADDITIONAL UNREDACTED FILING UNDER SEAL. A
person making a redacted filing may also file an unredacted copy
under seal. The court must retain the unredacted copy as part of
the record.
(g) OPTION FOR FILING A REFERENCE LIST. A filing that contains
redacted information may be filed together with a reference list
that identifies each item of redacted information and specifies an
appropriate identifier that uniquely corresponds to each item listed. The list must be filed under seal and may be amended as of
right. Any reference in the case to a listed identifier will be construed to refer to the corresponding item of information.
(h) WAIVER OF PROTECTION OF IDENTIFIERS. A person waives the
protection of Rule 5.2(a) as to the person’s own information by filing it without redaction and not under seal.
(As added Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007.)
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
b073b627976d3ba2a9f6b1ffaa6005bafe4918556079d175a6533e1157eae4bf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.