Bindinglaw

US · rules

S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1

Motions, General

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Filing.

(1) Every motion when filed and served shall incorporate a memorandum of law citing

supporting authorities, except that the following motions need not incorporate a

memorandum:

(A) petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum or ad prosequendum;

(B) motion for out-of-state process;

(C) motion for order of publication for process;

(D) application for default;

(E) motion for judgment upon default;

(F) motion to withdraw or substitute counsel;

(G) motion for continuance, provided the good cause supporting it is set forth

in the motion and affidavit required by Local Rule 7.6;

(H) motion for confirmation of sale;

(I) motion to withdraw or substitute exhibits;

(J) motion for extensions of time providing the good cause supporting it is set

forth in the motion;

(K) motion for refund of bond, provided the good cause supporting it is set forth

in the motion;

(L) application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis;

(M) motion for admission pro hac vice; and

(N) motion for court approval of a stipulation between any parties.

(2) Those motions listed in (a)(1) above, as well as any motion seeking emergency or

ex parte relief or a temporary restraining order, shall be accompanied by a proposed

order that is filed and served submitted via e-mail to the Court as prescribed by

Section 3I(6) of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures.

(3) Pre-filing Conferences Required of Counsel. Prior to filing any motion in a civil

case, except a motion for injunctive relief, for judgment on the pleadings, for

summary judgment, to dismiss or to permit maintenance of a class action, to dismiss

for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, for pro hac vice

admission, or to involuntarily dismiss an action, for garnishment or other relief

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64, or otherwise properly filed ex parte under

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and these Local Rules, or a petition to enforce

or vacate an arbitration award, counsel for the movant shall confer (orally or in

writing), or make reasonable effort to confer (orally or in writing), with all parties

or non-parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues to be raised in the motion. Counsel

conferring with movant’s counsel shall cooperate and act in good faith in

attempting to resolve the dispute. At the end of the motion, and above the signature

block, counsel for the moving party shall certify either: (A) that counsel for the

movant has conferred with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by the

relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in the

motion and has been unable to do so; or (B) that counsel for the movant has made

reasonable efforts to confer with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by

the relief sought in the motion, which efforts shall be identified with specificity in

the statement (including the date, time, and manner of each effort), but has been

unable to do so. If certain of the issues have been resolved by agreement, the

certification shall specify the issues so resolved and the issues remaining

unresolved. Failure to comply with the requirements of this Local Rule may be

cause for the Court to grant or deny the motion and impose on counsel an

appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay the amount of the

reasonable expenses incurred because of the violation, including a reasonable

attorney’s fee. See forms available on the Court’s website (www.flsd.uscourts.gov).

(b) Hearings.

(1) No hearing will be held on motions unless set by the Court.

(2) A party who desires oral argument or a hearing of any motion shall request it within

the motion or opposing memorandum in a separate section titled “request for

hearing.” The request shall set forth in detail the reasons why a hearing is desired

and would be helpful to the Court and shall estimate the time required for argument.

The Court in its discretion may grant or deny a hearing as requested, upon

consideration of both the request and any response thereto by an opposing party.

(3) Discovery motions may be referred to and heard by a United States Magistrate

Judge.

(4) With respect to:

(A) any motion in a civil case or any post-conviction motion in a criminal case

that has been pending and fully briefed with no hearing set thereon for a

period of ninety (90) days, and

(B) any motion in a civil case or any post-conviction motion in a criminal case as to

which the Court has conducted a hearing but has not entered an order or

otherwise determined the motion or matter within ninety (90) days of the

hearing, the movant, whether party or non-party;

shall file and serve on all parties and any affected non-parties within

fourteen (14) days thereafter a “Notice of Ninety Days Expiring,” which

shall contain the following information:

(i) the title and docket entry number of the subject motion, along with

the dates of service and filing;

(ii) the title and docket entry number of any and all responses or

opposing memoranda, along with the dates of service and filing, or

if no such papers have been filed, the date on which such papers

were due;

(iii) the title and docket entry number of any reply memoranda, or any

other papers filed and served in connection with the motion, as well

as the dates of service and filing; and

(iv) the date of any hearing held on the motion.

(C) any motion filed in a proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255 is not subject

to the ninety (90) day notice provision set forth above.

(c) Memorandum of Law.

(1) Requirements and Timing. For all motions, except motions served with the

summons and complaint, each party opposing a motion shall file and serve an

opposing memorandum of law no later than fourteen (14) days after service of the

motion. Failure to do so may be deemed sufficient cause for granting the motion by

default. The movant may, within seven (7) days after service of an opposing

memorandum of law, file and serve a reply memorandum in support of the motion,

which reply memorandum shall be strictly limited to rebuttal of matters raised in

the memorandum in opposition without reargument of matters covered in the

movant’s initial memorandum of law. No further or additional memoranda of law

shall be filed and served without prior leave of Court. All materials in support of

any motion, response, or reply, including affidavits and declarations, shall be served

with the filing. For a motion served with the summons and complaint, the opposing

memorandum of law shall be due on the day the response to the complaint is due.

Time shall be computed under this Local Rule in accordance with applicable federal

rules of procedure (e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(a)).

(2) Length. Absent prior permission of the Court, neither a motion and its incorporated

memorandum of law nor the opposing memorandum of law shall exceed twenty

(20) pages; a reply memorandum shall not exceed ten (10) pages. As long as no

substantive part of the submission appears on the same page(s), the following items

do not count toward page limitations for purposes of this rule and any other rules

or orders setting forth page limitations: title pages preceding the first page of text,

tables of contents, tables of citations, “request for hearing” sections, signature

pages, certificates of good faith conferences, and certificates of service.

(d) Emergency Motions and Expedited Motions. The Court may, upon written motion and good

cause shown, waive the time requirements of this Local Rule and grant an immediate or

expedited hearing on any matter requiring such expedited procedure. A filer may seek

expedited consideration through either an emergency motion or an expedited motion in

accordance with the following requirements:

(1) Emergency Motions. A filer requesting emergency action must include the words

“Emergency Motion” in the title of the motion and must set forth in detail the nature

of the emergency, the date by which a ruling is necessary, and the reason the ruling

is needed by the stated date. The unwarranted designation of a motion as an

emergency motion may result in sanctions. The filer must certify that the matter is

a true emergency by including the following certification before the motion’s

signature block:

After reviewing the facts and researching applicable legal principles, I certify that

this motion in fact presents a true emergency (as opposed to a matter that may need

only expedited treatment) and requires an immediate ruling because the Court

would not be able to provide meaningful relief to a critical, non-routine issue after

the expiration of seven days. I understand that an unwarranted certification may

lead to sanctions.

As prescribed by Section 10 of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures, a party

seeking to file an emergency motion must file and serve the documents

electronically via CM/ECF using the events specifically earmarked for emergency

matters. Motions are not considered emergencies if the urgency arises because of

the attorney’s or party’s own dilatory conduct. Generally, unless a motion will

become moot if not ruled on within seven (7) days, the motion should not be filed

as an emergency motion.

(2) Expedited Motions. A filer whose time-sensitive motion does not qualify as an

emergency motion but who nonetheless requires an expedited ruling by a date

certain may file an expedited motion in lieu of an emergency motion. The motion

must include the words “Expedited Motion” in the title and must set forth in detail

the date by which an expedited ruling is needed and the reason the ruling is needed

by the stated date.

In criminal cases, emergency motions and expedited motions that are also ex parte must be

conventionally filed.

A party appearing pro se must conventionally file emergency motions and expedited

motions.

(e) Applications Previously Refused. Whenever any motion or application has been made to any

Judge or Magistrate Judge and has been refused in whole or in part, or has been granted

conditionally, and a subsequent motion or application is made to a different District Judge or

Magistrate Judge for the same relief in whole or in part, upon the same or any alleged different

state of facts, it shall be the continuing duty of each party and attorney seeking such relief to

present to the District Judge or Magistrate Judge to whom the subsequent application is made

an affidavit setting forth the material facts and circumstances surrounding each prior

application, including: (1) when and to what District Judge or Magistrate Judge the application

was made; (2) what ruling was made thereon; and (3) what new or different facts and

circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist, or were not shown, upon the prior

application. For failure to comply with the requirements of this Local Rule, any ruling made

on the subsequent application may be set aside sua sponte or on ex parte motion.

History

Effective December 1, 1994. Amended effective April 15, 1996; April 15, 1997; April 15, 2000; April 1, 2004; April 15, 2005; April 15, 2006; April 15, 2007; April 15, 2009; April 15, 2010; April 15, 2011; December 1, 2011; December 1, 2014; December 1, 2015; December 1, 2016; December 1, 2017; December 3, 2018; December 2, 2019; December 1, 2020; December 1, 2021; December 2, 2024; December 1, 2025.

Provenance

Source
www.flsd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
257445b9b49c179959d9422ae95b782e035eaa09e103e4661b870d56275065c6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1 — Motions, General · binding.law