US · rules
N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 54.1
Motions for Attorney’s Fees
(A) Bifurcated Procedure. A party who seeks an award of attorney’s fees must first
move for a determination of the party’s entitlement to a fee award and may move for
a determination of the amount of an award only after the Court determines the
party’s entitlement to an award. Local Rule 7.1, including the requirement for the
attorneys to confer in a good-faith effort to resolve the dispute, applies in full.
(B) Deadline for an Entitlement Motion. The deadline for moving for a determination
of entitlement is 14 days after the entry of the judgment or, if there is no judgment,
14 days after the case is closed. An appeal does not extend the deadline unless the
Court so orders.
(C) Maintaining Time Records. No award of attorney’s fees will be made based in
whole or part on time devoted to a case unless the attorney or other timekeeper made
a contemporaneous, detailed record of the time to the nearest tenth hour. A detailed
record must provide enough information to allow the Court to evaluate
reasonableness; an entry like “research” or “conference” without a description of the
subject will not do.
(D) Filing and Disclosing Time Records. Unless an assigned judge orders otherwise,
the time records must not be filed with the Clerk until necessary for the
determination of a fee motion. But a party must promptly disclose to another
party—on a request made at any time—the total number of hours that have been
devoted to the case by the party’s attorneys and other timekeepers through the end of
the month preceding the request.
(E) Required Filings in Support of a Motion to Determine the Fee Amount. If the
Court determines that a party is entitled to a fee award, the party must file within 30
days:
(1) A declaration setting out the time devoted to the case by date and task,
specifically identifying the timekeeper and the timekeeper’s claimed hourly
rate. The declaration must include sufficient detail to allow a determination of
reasonableness. And the declaration must include sufficient detail to allow the
maximum feasible separation of time devoted to matters that are and are not
compensable and matters on which the party did and did not prevail.
(2) A declaration of an independent attorney addressing the reasonableness of the
claimed time and rates.
(F) Required Filings in Opposition to a Motion to Determine the Fee Amount. A
party who opposes a motion to determine the fee amount must file within 30 days
after the motion is served a memorandum specifically identifying any objection to
the claimed amount. If the party objects to a timekeeper’s claimed hourly rate, the
memorandum must set out the rate that the party asserts is reasonable. If the party
asserts that hours should be reduced or not compensated, the memorandum must
identify the hours or otherwise specifically describe the proposed reduction. The
memorandum must set out the fee award the party asserts would be reasonable—and
by doing so the party will not be deemed to waive the party’s objection that fees
should not be awarded at all.
(G) Additional Conference and Notice. After a party files a memorandum in opposition
to the motion to determine the fee amount, the attorneys must confer again in a
good-faith effort to resolve the dispute—on amount if not also on entitlement. The
parties must file a notice of whether they have reached any agreement. The deadline
for the notice is 14 days after the memorandum in opposition was filed.
Provenance
- Source
- www.flnd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
90ec8b78b4d0dfec37fa1d6cfd58f29e88cc87bb010650c047132aeaad55d67d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.