Bindinglaw

US · rules

D.D.C. LCvR 84.9

Confidentiality

activein force · 2026-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT.

(1) The Court hereby prohibits the mediator, all counsel and parties and any other

persons attending the mediation from disclosing any written or oral

communications made in connection with or during any mediation session.

(2) There shall be no communication between the mediator and the assigned judge

regarding a case that has been referred to mediation. Disputes and complaints of

any kind, the resolution of which may require the disclosure of information

acquired through a mediation, shall not be heard by the assigned judge but shall

be brought to the attention of the Compliance Judge as outlined in LCvR 84.10

below.

(3) Information acquired through mediation shall not be used for any purpose,

including impeachment, in any pending or future proceeding in this or any other

court or forum. Mediators shall not respond to subpoenas or requests for such

information or disclose such information voluntarily. Mediators who are served

with a subpoena or otherwise asked for information about any mediation in which

they have participated shall immediately inform the Director of Dispute

Resolution of the request.

(b) CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.

The mediator may ask the parties and all persons attending the mediation to sign a

confidentiality agreement on a form provided by the Court, but the confidentiality

requirements of this section apply regardless of whether a confidentiality agreement is

signed.

(c) EXCEPTIONS.

(1) Nothing in this Rule shall be construed to prohibit disclosures to persons not

directly participating in a mediation (such as corporate or government officials)

whose possession of mediation-related information counsel believe to be

necessary to further the progress of the talks in the case; or to help the institution

respond to the mediation program generally. Persons not attending a mediation

who are given information on this "need to know" basis shall also be bound by

this Rule regarding confidentiality.

(2) This Rule shall not be construed to prohibit parties from entering written

agreements resolving some or all of the case or from entering and filing

procedural or factual stipulations based on suggestions or agreements made in

connection with a mediation.

(3) Information which is obtained through discovery or other means outside the

mediation process shall not be rendered inadmissible or non-discoverable because

it is used or presented in mediation.

(4) This Rule does not preclude a report to or an inquiry by the Compliance Judge

pursuant to LCvR 84.10 below regarding a possible violation of these Rules.

(5) Nothing in this Rule shall be construed to prohibit the mediator, counsel or

litigants from discussing, with the Court's ADR staff, the progress of a mediation

or the specific facts and ideas discussed in the course of mediated negotiations.

Such communications are encouraged to permit the staff to monitor the quality of

the mediation services being provided.

(6) This Rule does not preclude dissemination of information about the types of cases

going through the Mediation Program or about overall program results. Generic

information about the program and cases entering mediation is available, and

reports are generated for analysis and evaluation. Individual cases that have been

resolved through mediation may be publicly identified, discussed or brought to

the Court's attention if the parties consent to such a disclosure.

Provenance

Source
www.dcd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
7ded29b3f2c0243f3bf40fe8134b5a768bb6113c093effefd9b5bcb96e7f0e47
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.